PLEASE!!! Separate category for female models!

  • 2
  • Idea
  • Updated 6 years ago
PLEASE!!!! Create a separate category for female models. It skews the results when my black and white landscapes have to compete with a lingerie clad hottie!!! If I can beat a half dressed hottie with a tree then I should get bonus points. Kidding aside I would love to see all the female models separated. They should be competing against each other only. It's just not fair to let them compete in the general population.
Photo of Tom Shope

Tom Shope

  • 9 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like

Posted 6 years ago

  • 2
Photo of Lenore

Lenore

  • 2835 Posts
  • 937 Reply Likes
You mean the subcategories in the BW category, right? If there are landscapes in the People category or models in the Landscape category, I hope you're reported them :-)
Photo of Tom Shope

Tom Shope

  • 9 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Yes, the subcategories in black and white all compete together. My footbridge has to compete with young beautiful female models. That just makes no sense. Men will vote with their...ummm....well you know....
Photo of Lenore

Lenore

  • 2835 Posts
  • 937 Reply Likes
:-)
Photo of Jason Kiefer

Jason Kiefer, Official Rep

  • 3044 Posts
  • 414 Reply Likes
Hey Tom - Unfortunately we probably have too many categories the way it is. I understand your frustration though.
Photo of Gary Beresford

Gary Beresford

  • 15 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
Have a look at black and white leaderboard for all time. It is totally skewed to pictures of female models that have been over smoothed and over processed. It is near impossible to compete in any B&W category or People category unless you take pictures of such women and process them in this particular fashion. It's not really worth the effort trying. I have one male B&W picture up currently that is doing OK, but about the last 20 duels have been with these over processed models. Of course, as suggested, there is a huge element here that can't see past their &*^(^%^&( to vote on a picture's quality. Ahhhh well....
Photo of C.Charles

C.Charles

  • 1066 Posts
  • 278 Reply Likes
The B&W category in its current form is a complete waste of time, all it tends to be is a dumping ground for Colour to B&W duplicate image conversions from the ID crowd.

I do not mind any image as long as the tog has sees the best image as B&W.

These are the typical ID togs that covert nearly every image into B&W, what are they trying to prove or gain....they all seem clueless.

http://www.pixoto.com/amond.ramandhareal

http://www.pixoto.com/dhaniphotomorphose

http://www.pixoto.com/robert.cinega

http://www.pixoto.com/yudi.prabowo3

this one from the US:

http://www.pixoto.com/ahad.esmaeilian

Jason....your decision to allow B&W duplicates does not make this site exciting and vibrate ...it's monotonous repetition.
Photo of Terry Gower

Terry Gower

  • 2016 Posts
  • 633 Reply Likes
I have to agree with Bill, been thinking this for awhile. At first I thought it would be ok to allow b/w duplicates but its got silly now.

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.