Landscape should be a category on it's own.

  • 46
  • Idea
  • Updated 8 years ago
  • Implemented
Have you thought about having landscapes as a separate category (incorporating seascapes of course) as the landscape and nature category is currently huge as it covers a large spectrum of subjects. Plus I feel that landscape photography is a genre of its own and should be distinct from the rest of nature photography like flowers etc.
Photo of Martin Thomas

Martin Thomas

  • 14 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like

Posted 9 years ago

  • 46
Photo of Jason Kiefer

Jason Kiefer, Official Rep

  • 2228 Posts
  • 360 Reply Likes
I think we agree. We are re-evaluating all of our categories now based on feedback.
Photo of Jim Moon

Jim Moon

  • 19 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
I tend to agree with the Flowers and Plants being put in their own category. A majority of those are shot in studio environment, and they tend to be like cats and dogs and bug photos, a bunch of them. I think it was P.T. Barnum who said, never try to compete against a baby or a puppy, you will always lose.
Photo of Natasha Shakhnes

Natasha Shakhnes

  • 32 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Also, I think that 'Towns and villages" should be a sub-category of 'Architecture'. I often see pictures in the category 'Landscape and nature' that show neither landscape nor nature and it is quite weird.

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.