Found these articles about a disqualified winning photo because of photoshop in landscape photography- very interesting

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 6 years ago
Archived and Closed

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members. The community moderator provided the following reason for archiving: Not related to Pixoto

Photo of Shooting America

Shooting America

  • 741 Posts
  • 381 Reply Likes

Posted 6 years ago

  • 1
Photo of Vibeke

Vibeke

  • 138 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
All very interesting, but Pixoto states;

In an effort to find the best, and most striking imagery, extensive use of Photoshop or other post processing techniques is allowed in all categories. However images that look like “digital art” rather than photography should be categorized as such.

The site I belonged to be for Pixoto, allowed no additions or deletions, no vignettes or borders, probably too restrictive, while Pixoto is too generous. Hard to find the perfect mixture.

Perhaps we should start a poll of what we like least about the site and to not be to negative and other list of what we like most.
Photo of redwar

redwar

  • 470 Posts
  • 93 Reply Likes
Yeah, its pretty had not to notice that the upside down boats have highlights starting from the photographer's POV but the sun is going down opposite of the POV.

But made me laugh is the third link where the shading blocks up at 180 degrees opposite of the light source and yet the same angle for the back of the big building has details that couldn't happen either.

British proper I suppose.
Photo of Lenore

Lenore

  • 2835 Posts
  • 937 Reply Likes
This is one of my absolute favourite articles -- worth reading, in my opinion, from the first word to the last (it's not long). It makes excellent points. Especially the last paragraph :-)

http://jerrybuley.com/Truth-Beauty&fi...
Photo of Bridgette Rodriguez

Bridgette Rodriguez

  • 813 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
And? Pixoto has already made up its mind to accept photoshopped and excessively processed/altered photos, period. And those photos are usually the ones that are at the very top of the Leaderboard in the different categories, including Landscape.

FYI, in one of my previous suggestions I made about forming a different category for minimally processed photos, I noted how the very well RESPECTED National Geographic does NOT allow HDR and excessively processed photos in their photo contests (for the public).
Photo of Tim Hall

Tim Hall

  • 486 Posts
  • 228 Reply Likes
Not defending either side, but this guy was disqualified for braking the rules, which seem to be...enhancing photos is okay, but altering the photos is not. Just their site's rules, Pixoto makes their own rules, it's their site...so be it either way in my opinion.

(Favorite rant warning)...The writer of the article shows his ignorance by citing the work of Ansel Adams as evidence against the legitimacy of modern day photoshopping...What irks me to no end is the fact that none of Ansel Adam's work was realistically reproduced...I have studied Mr. Adams work for some years...He said in a BBC interview when asked about this very subject...he says, with a wry smile , "Oh, none of my images are realistic". Yep, straight from the Yosemite horse's mouth..."None of my images are realistic". He goes on to say that none of the light and shadow values he is so famous for are realistic either, and his prints were so "unrealistic" that he said they were, "very hard to reproduce", they all came about in the post processing, and he cites the fact that were printed on silver coated print paper to give them the "chrome effect" he is so famous for.

The interviewer then asks Ansel why he thought his work needed such enhancements and Mr Adams said if he had to use his images straight from the camera, "The world would look like an ugly place!": Then he shows three different post processed enhancements of the same photo...all different, which I believe was "Sunset Moonrise".

I found the Library of Congress Online Collections has a number of Ansel's glass plate negatives he donated, and prints are presented straight from his camera without the benefit of Ansel's post processing, and the poor quality of his original unedited and un-enhanced work is shocking.

If anyone wants to give evidence against the legitimacy of post camera enhancing then they need to quit using Ansel Adams as an example of pure or natural or real photography because Ansel said it best himself, "None of my images are realistic".

(The entire interview is available on youtube).
Photo of Bridgette Rodriguez

Bridgette Rodriguez

  • 813 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
Lenore, true about all contests have different rules, but, again, all NG's require submissions to not be excessively edited and no HDR. They have not changed.
Photo of Johnny Thomas

Johnny Thomas

  • 189 Posts
  • 57 Reply Likes
Bridgette, that is why National Geographic is still a respected source for great photography and the fact that they prohibit excessive editing for their photo contests shows that they don't want "visual artifice" to become part of what they are known for and their much-respected world.
Photo of Bridgette Rodriguez

Bridgette Rodriguez

  • 813 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
Lenore, go look at their yearly contests over the last few years and you will see their requirements (NG's).
Photo of Tim Hall

Tim Hall

  • 486 Posts
  • 228 Reply Likes
Bridgette, I agree with you regarding Nat Geo because Nat Geo magazine is first and foremost..."journalism"...Journalism is supposed to be a presentation of the World's reality...of course they wouldn't allow photos to be unreal in their presentation.

Pixoto is an artist's site and makes makes no intention of presenting itself as journalism. Every type of site should be able to make their own rules, Diversity is good!
Photo of Bridgette Rodriguez

Bridgette Rodriguez

  • 813 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
Tim, I would even go further and say, "photojournalism". However, they have been, and I believe still are, known far more for their photography than for journalism. I respect them, and, no, Pixoto is definitely not National Geographic.
Photo of Pete Bobb

Pete Bobb

  • 193 Posts
  • 62 Reply Likes
From the article at the first link:
"... further investigation has confirmed that the image chosen as the overall winner is in breach of the rules...and can announce that [SB] is the new winner of this year’s competition..."
Has pixoto ever increased awards (i.e. #2 moving to #1) based on the winner being disqualified, such as for winning #1 Photographer of the Year using stolen photos that are copyright by other photographers?
Photo of Johnny Thomas

Johnny Thomas

  • 189 Posts
  • 57 Reply Likes
Interesting question.
Photo of Tim Hall

Tim Hall

  • 486 Posts
  • 228 Reply Likes
I play basketball in my friend's driveway, and I shoot pictures on my road trips. I don't think that makes me comparable to Micheal Jordan, or a National Geographic photographer...Why in the world is anyone here trying to compare Pixoto to the National Geographic Society? Good gracious, ya'll, I wish my images were good enough to be featured in Nat Geo magazine.

I just took a picture of my friend's cat, and I should be upset that Pixoto isn't treating the pic like it belongs in a Nat Geo article about mummified Egyptian animals? Nope, it's just a pic of my friend's cat, and thank you Pixoto I can post it on line for free....Really?..this is supposed to be fun. Not world class journalism.

If anyone's photos can stand up to the National Geographic's standards then I am very happy for you, and wish you well n your world travels...Me? I just got a top 5 Pixoto award for that pic of my friend's cat...and I'm real happy about it.
Photo of Lenore

Lenore

  • 2835 Posts
  • 937 Reply Likes
Bridgette: You keep making claims about National Geographic based on one contest. You said, "....all NG's require submissions to not be excessively edited and no HDR." You used the word "all". You were referring to all the National Geographic contests.

On what do you base this?

I disagree. Completely. Here is why:

1) Since you are so familiar with NG, I'm sure you're aware of their daily competition called "Your Shot". I'm sure you get their emails, as I have done for quite some time. (For those who do not, here's the link: http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/ )

2) I posted a link above to NG's Photo Gallery "How to Take HDR Pictures" which presents tips and a selection of HDR photographs that NG deemed good enough to highlight on their web site. Here is the link again so you don't have to scroll up: http://photography.nationalgeographic...

3) Please go to that link and look at the photographs. Please look at the source of each photo. Where did NG get these photographs? From their daily competition, Your Shot. Every single photograph that NG is highlighting here -- each one, HDR -- is from NG's own daily competition, Your Shot.

Every one but the cows.

Their competition. HDR photographs entered. HDR photographs shared, by NG, with the world because they like them so much.

So .... how can it be that National Geographic does not allow HDR images in "all" (your words) competitions when they are posting HDR images that were from their daily competitions? Not only accepting them but thinking them good enough to highlight? How?
Photo of Tim Hall

Tim Hall

  • 486 Posts
  • 228 Reply Likes
Wise, well said, and well documented, Lenore

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.