Updates to List Pages

  • 10
  • Announcement
  • Updated 15 hours ago
  • (Edited)
Today (Dec 6) we are announcing an update to the List pages on the IMDb desktop experience. This update is part of the broader site changes announced recently (https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/upcoming-changes-to-several-imdb-features-du6man1opd5q0). After in-depth discussion and examination, we have decided to simplify the features and functionality for lists. We have merged “compact view” and list editing into a single Edit experience. In that one view, you can now modify your text and add, copy, delete and move items. We have also pulled List actions (edit, export, settings) together into a 1-click menu (the 3 vertical dots on the top right of the page). You will now also find two new options in the Refine menu: ‘In Theaters’ and ‘Keywords.’  Tech constraints on the new system prohibit us from continuing to support drag-and-drop from the Edit view; we appreciate your understanding. For more information about Lists, see the IMDb Help Center.
Photo of Karen

Karen, Official Rep

  • 43 Posts
  • 49 Reply Likes

Posted 2 months ago

  • 10
Photo of Chris Dynamo

Chris Dynamo

  • 29 Posts
  • 37 Reply Likes
Someone, for the love of God, help me; for some reason, every time I click on my list link (Best TV of 2017), it gives me an error 404 page, from any other list that links it, not just that though, for some reason it splices my 2016 list, as shown below.  Please help.

 http://www.imdb.com/list/ls066542520/www.imdb.com/list/ls020052853/

So here's a normal list with that link (http://www.imdb.com/list/ls055426815/), as you can see, it's fine on my end, must be another site glitch.  Col, Karen, Dan, pool your resources if you can, number one priority here, code red if you will.


Also, all of my lists are saying 0 views this week (like the list above, ending in 6815), save 1, despite each list typically getting hundreds every 3 days, is it another glitch or is no-one reading lists anymore??
Photo of Chris Dynamo

Chris Dynamo

  • 29 Posts
  • 37 Reply Likes
Dan Dassow- Appreciate the response, I use the [link] [/link] combo that the site suggests, it works perfectly for the other lists but this one list is randomly wacky now.  Definitely not a mistake on my end, must be the site again. You have pull here on IMDb, see what you can do, thanks.

Don't get jealous Jeorj, you're still my bro!
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 676 Posts
  • 337 Reply Likes
I was referring to the relationship between "customers" and staff, not between you (or me) and fellow customer Dan Dassow. If anything, we should be jealous of Dan :P
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 7111 Posts
  • 5621 Reply Likes
@Chris Dynamo,

Please try the format that I suggest. We know it works for:
Test For Links
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls027298918/

This is the formatting text I used:
Best TV Shows of 2017: [link=www.imdb.com/list/ls020052853/]
= = =

Even though I have some credibility with the IMDb Technical Staff, they are still likely to put a low priority on this problem; it is an isolated problem that may be difficult to diagnose and only affects one user.

By the way, this also works in my list. I have not been able to determine why it works for me and not for you.
Best TV Shows of 2017: [link=http://www.imdb.com/list/ls020052853/]
Best TV Shows of 2017: [link=http://www.imdb.com/list/ls020052853/]http://www.imdb.com/list/ls020052853/[/link]
(Edited)
Photo of Chris Dynamo

Chris Dynamo

  • 29 Posts
  • 37 Reply Likes
Sweet Jesus Dan, you've only gone and done it!  Totally works, get this damn site to hire you, particularly in the wake of this catastrophic "update"; they need you.  Have a good Christmas mate, thanks.
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 7111 Posts
  • 5621 Reply Likes
@Chris Dynamo,

Have a great Christmas.
Photo of Oscar Calixto

Oscar Calixto

  • 7 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
And... The rss feeds lists was broken. No expose more in my web site cause the Imdb put down.
Photo of Matt

Matt

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled List RSS No Longer Working.

The RSS feed for my list is gone. Using the RSS URL now returns the desktop version of the list versus the valid XML. Have you decided to stop supporting RSS for lists?

Here is the URL I have been using: http://rss.imdb.com/list/ls004040167/
Photo of Amir Sheykhi

Amir Sheykhi

  • 1 Post
  • 3 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled why drag feature is gone?.

I see you guys updated website theme and feature, it's look great but we cant drag items while we editing our list anymore. please bring back drag! it was really Effective.
Photo of Udyan Khurana

Udyan Khurana

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled reodering created lists.

Hi! I wanted to ask how can I reorder the lists that I have created on
the website? Since the update few months ago, I can't drag and reorder
lists, and if I reorder by switching the numbers of 2 titles and save,
it says "an error occured while saving". What should I do?
Photo of Edward Snanigan

Edward Snanigan

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled The options for viewing and editing my movie lists now pales in comparison to the....

New list options
Photo of asaaf00

asaaf00

  • 2 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
I used to reorder titles and other added stuff in lists by drag-dropping them to the position I want, but now after the newly designed page I can only reorder the items by typing the numbers of the positions I want which is really frustrating and takes a lot of time. Please bring draging and dropping back, it's way easier and more practical to use.
(Edited)
Photo of Airantas Rimkus

Airantas Rimkus

  • 0 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Why there is no more YOU HAVE SEEN films on any users films lists??.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
The Dec 6 Update eliminated the You Have Seen bar. But you can determine that info by using the Refine feature (just above 1st title), selecting You and This List > Titles I Rated.

I know, not nearly as convenient, but at least the option is still there.
Photo of Oscar Calixto

Oscar Calixto

  • 7 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
We need thr rss option for the lists! ia a bad actualization! Many problems! Rss feed!!!!
Photo of jhf1987

jhf1987

  • 4 Posts
  • 20 Reply Likes
It's a shame the drag-drop hasn't come back, it was the nicest feature of the lists; overall this update seems rather a step back than forward to me
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 676 Posts
  • 337 Reply Likes
That makes sense, Dr-Faustus.
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 99 Posts
  • 34 Reply Likes
Great. Guess we will just have to wait and see how things progress in the following months.
Thanks for your help Jeorj.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
Hey Jeorj, nothing to do with these comments: I just wanted to thank you for liking so many of my posts, if for no other reason than it's the only way I get a copy of them!

I'm still using your compact-a-list bookmarklet. I thought I saw another one days later, but lost it. What did that one do?
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 676 Posts
  • 337 Reply Likes
I did post an earlier bookmarklet pertaining to how messages' posting dates show up on Get Satisfaction, since ACT_1 keeps asking IMDb staff members to include the date of posting in their announcements. Please see reply no. 19,100,256 and the replies to it.
Photo of ACT_1

ACT_1

  • 691 Posts
  • 232 Reply Likes

Jeorj Euler :

since ACT_1 keeps asking IMDb staff members to include the date of posting in their announcements.

1 month ago (November 16 2017 3:58 AM)


ACT_1 - 2 days ago (December 28 2017 1:10 AM)

Advanced Search Updates
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/advanced-search-updates-9rehrj3uf8rdx?topic-reply-list[setti...


You should add the date to your post (Put the Subject 1st ?)

We're pleased to announce that today, December 28, 2017,
we've launched some updates to the Advanced Search pages
As Col referenced in his earlier post
(https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/upcoming-changes-to-several-imdb-features-du6man1opd5q0)

For the Yellow box top right of main page ...



(Edited)
Photo of Craig

Craig

  • 4 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled My Lists.

Over the past 7 or 8 years, I have created close to a hundred lists to which I refer very often.  These lists are still available to me, but I am no longer able to sort them by IMDb rating, my personal rating, alphabetically, by release date, etc.  Also, I had each of my lists defaulted to a list view without visuals and this feature is no longer available.  My understanding is that there are fundamental changes in process.  Will these features return at some point or are they gone forever?  If the latter, I am extremely disappointed.  Thanks for any feedback you can give me.
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 7111 Posts
  • 5621 Reply Likes
Although this is significantly less convenient, you can use an Advanced Title Search to sort any title list in rating order. If you are logged in, you will see under Lists Include: a list of your title lists.

1. Select one of your lists under Lists Include.
2. Select User Rating Descending (or other sorting options) under Display Options.
3. Click the yellow Search button.

For example, this is one of my lists sorting in descending order of user ratings:
Highest Rated Titles In Your "All 151 Oscar-Qualifying Documentaries for 2013" List
http://www.imdb.com/search/title?lists=ls052183003&sort=user_rating,desc

... and, yes, this is much less convenient than being able to do this on the page of the list.
Photo of Craig

Craig

  • 4 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Thank you very much, Dan!  Once I posted this, IMDb alerted me that my post had been merged with this lengthy, substantial conversation.  It has been helpful to read so many other comments with frustrations similar to my own.  I'm all for healthy change, but hopefully things will continue to "improve" for those of us who liked things the way they were!  ;-) 
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 28 Posts
  • 78 Reply Likes
I totally agree.  Nobody here is saying there shouldn't be any changes.  We all understand that for the most part.  Its the nature of the internet.  What's annoying is taking away useful features like what you mentioned above.  I have a list of 1,000 movies and to view and edit them now is unbearably tedious now that compact mode is gone.  I have to search through ten pages (instead of 4) every time I want to review my list but what's worse is I can only see 2 titles on my computer screen at a time instead of 25.  Editing mode isn't much better at all especially if you have reviews or notes that just take up more space.  I don't care to even look at other lists anymore because I can only see tiny bits and pieces at a time.  Its like looking at a painting 1/4 inch in front of my face.

I'm just curious why IMDB viewed compact mode as a useless feature?  What is the reasoning behind getting rid of it?  What would have been the harm in keeping that feature available?  Is it because people won't see a link to Amazon's video?  IMDB would still be able to do that in compact mode by adding a hyperlink.  Also of course that wouldn't apply to people, video game lists, etc.  Was it too much work for them to include that feature when they updated the site?  I don't want to export my list and adjust/edit the excel file just so I can see my lists from a reasonable distance.  Please someone help me understand.  This was a fun daily hobby of mine and now its totally ruined.  Please someone reconsider bringing back compact mode (250 titles per page)!  IMDB has their top 250 on one page why can't their users have that preference as well?  Thank you and Merry Christmas to all IMDB staff members.
(Edited)
Photo of Craig

Craig

  • 4 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Wow, Bravo, Chris!  Excellent stated.
Photo of suasheva

suasheva

  • 19 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Can U bring back starmeter on people list, I really need that.
Photo of Patrick Colin Jackson

Patrick Colin Jackson

  • 2 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled TrekFan1 (AKA Mr. Charles Trotter) needs us!.

For the past few years, Mr. Charles Trotter (AKA TrekFan1) has been compiling what I consider invaluable lists of the notable entertainment figures who passed away that year, ordered by date of death. His most recent list has been for 2017.

More recently, he posted this message which I feel you should read. He has worked too hard, and done too good a job, to be ignored.

IMPORTANT NOTICE (12/13/2017): Due to changes implemented by IMDb, this may be my final Notable Showbiz Deaths list. IMDb has removed the "reference view" option that makes pages easier to read and navigate than the "new" layout they are forcing on their users. With the "new" layout, name pages become cluttered messes that I refuse to navigate, and I need to go through the credits on those pages to determine who gets added to these lists. Since name pages will no longer be sightly or easily navigable, I will no longer be using them, which means no more of these lists. I will continue updating this and previous death lists, but I will not be creating others unless the folks at IMDb change their minds. If you find these lists useful and want me to keep doing them, then please contact IMDb and tell them to keep the old "reference" layout.

It was a shame when IMDB retired the message boards, and it would be even more of a shame if the powers-that-be retired such rosters as those Mr. Trotter has given us. If this database needs regular new employees, they could do a lot worse than hire him. Thank you for your time and consideration; have a delightful Holiday Season.

Cordially Yours,

Patrick Jackson
626.799.4557
khaosjr@yahoo.com
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 99 Posts
  • 34 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled User Lists: Then & Now.

2017 is coming to a close. In retrospect, here is a list of changes to user-lists that have been implemented over the years:

The Comments Section
Then: An exclusive IMDb feature that proved to be a great mode of communication for members.
Now: Scrapped in favor of Facebook.
Result: If you like it or not, if you want to answer comments and communicate with others, you have no choice but to create a Facebook account. In my case, Facebook has not improved or promoted communication in comparison to the original system.

The Related Lists Feature
Then: Regardless of the length of a particular list. It would appear on the User Lists feature, visible on that title page.
Now: Where many lists are created in respect to a particular title - only lists in the low two-digit numbers appear on a particular page. This also applies to all other Related Lists where longer lists are excluded. Number of votes are taken into account in relation to entries on a particular list and if that list exceeds a particular total, it does not appear listed there.
Lists without subject, description, or relevance to anything, but a set of random titles takes precedence over well-researched, relevant lists. For example: 'To Download', 'Movies', 2017', 'Wish', 'To Watch' etc. etc. add little to nothing to the IMDb experience. Those IMDb members that truly contribute and bring legitimacy to this site, in regards to the content of their lists, (and there are a number of them) are however discouraged by the limitations imposed on them.
The new changes also exclude list descriptions that were previously available. A handy feature that informs of the content of a list without having to play roulette for the desired outcome of what you are looking for in a list of another.

DVD & Blu-ray and Genres
Then: Both the DVD & Blu-ray and Genres sections of the site had a feature where IMDb members could create their own lists with the option to "tag" and have their lists openly displayed in that section.
Now: Scapped.

Drag & Drop
Then: A necessary component of the user-list. Especially for longer lists and listees who are very specific in regards to placement of titles, and who update their lists on a constant basis, accordingly.
Now: Scrapped for a time-consuming, laborious, and impractical, number system editing feature.

Compact View
Then: A fast and effective means of reviewing a list. Especially handy for the list creator.
Now: Scrapped.

Scrolling Speed
Then: Freeflowing
Now: Jerky, occasionally freezes, slow. The same applies to editing, with the addition of the disappearance of the entire page which then manifests itself after a couple of seconds.

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/people/col_needham : "...lists are a core feature of IMDb and are from where IMDb originates..." 

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topi...
Photo of Denise

Denise

  • 22 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Description Markup - Only some of my "colors" are working..

Description Markup - Only some of my "colors" are working.
Photo of Howard

Howard

  • 1 Post
  • 4 Reply Likes
honestly, just bring back the compact mode. i haven't been on IMDB for a few months and this happens... just makes me want to use this website even less
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 28 Posts
  • 78 Reply Likes
I agree. What users were complaining about having compact mode? Who is actually saying now, "Thank God they took away compact mode. It's so much better to have less features and less ways to view my lists." ??? It's absolute nonsense. I'm preparing to update my favorites list but I have so many titles on it it's impossibly tedious to review it to see where I want to place my new entries.

My solution is to add an Amazon video hyperlink to the compact mode. It's obviously the reason why they got rid of compact mode because God forbid you can't see an Amazon link on everything nowadays. Or at least give a compact mode for the author at they very least! We dont need to read a whole synopsis and see a huge poster of every movie we have on our lists. We know already! Lol

Anybody with more than 100 titles per list should be disguised at this change. What on Earth is IMDB doing with their site? I'm finding myself clicking on this thread almost every time over viewing actual lists now. Just to see if they can actually say they may be considering to reconsider bringing back compact mode. At least give us some lip service.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
I miss Compact mode too, and I hope they'll bring it back. I love the new Edit mode for some purposes, but for rearranging position, or moving/copying a part of a list, not so much. Here's what I would do while we're waiting for CM to be restored if I were really itching to update my list.

I'd open a few tabs worth of my destination pages, and compact them with Jeorj's bookmarklet for Viewing a list. Every time you refresh the page to see the moves and new position numbers, you have to re-compact the page, but it's instantaneous. It's one of the reasons I'm displaying the Bookmarks Bar again.

If you need to have multiple tabs of Edit mode open, know that you can append &page= to the Edit URL (or the View list URL for that matter), and you can right-click the NEXT page link to open in new tab. Both should be helpful.

I'm not arguing that my suggestions are reasonable. Frankly, I'd like to see an ATS sort option of List Order so we can see the position number in a compact list of 250 again.

But I'd prefer the old Compact mode, where we could Refine and Move titles elsewhere. I have a custom-ordered list of 580+ titles with ~180 short films that I'd really like to move to another list. But they're interspersed throughout, and although I can see which ones are shorts while in Edit mode, and can use ctrl-F to find "short" everywhere. Still, if I miss one, then I have to re-position it after moving. I'm choosing to procrastinate that project until I know whether Compact will be resurrected orreplaced properly. 
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 28 Posts
  • 78 Reply Likes
Thanks appreciate it. But seems like too much effort and like you said about refining, etc. Just won't work for what I want to do. Really hope to hear back from IMDB about this and the reasoning for eliminating compact mode. Perhaps hopefully through understanding we can come to some sort of a compromise. I'm sure there's a lot more users upset about it but probably don't post here. In any case hope they can bring it back. Happy New Year too you and all the users and IMDB staff for working hard to improve and considering user suggestions for improving the site. Hope to hear from them.
Photo of Denise

Denise

  • 22 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled User Description Markup: Changes have been made to my ability to edit the "Descri....

Changes have been made to my ability to edit the "Description box" on my lists and am wondering if or when they will return. Besides creating [b]BOLD[/b] or [i]italic[/i] I was able to colorize my text. Currently purple is the only color that works. Will [blue]BLUE[/blue], [red]RED[/red] or any of the other colors be returning? Please see: https://www.imdb.com/activity/help/descriptionmarkup
Photo of Ilias Alkalais

Ilias Alkalais

  • 4 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled List editing has become a complete nightmare.

No compact list view, no alphabetical sorting in "EDIT" mode, no way to narrow listing e.g with actor name, director or IMDb code. Working with long lists, trying to find duplicates to delete, is impossible now. This is not an upgrade of features, this is a user non friendly downgrade.
Photo of Pete

Pete

  • 34 Posts
  • 19 Reply Likes
No alphabetical sorting in "EDIT" mode has made IMDb lists virtually uneditable.

If alphabetical sorting is available in VIEW mode, it should not be that big a deal for IMDb programmers to add that function to EDIT mode.
(Edited)
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
Don't wish so small. All of the Refine (perhaps not by Keyword) and Sort functions from View mode could/should be available in Edit mode.

Don't forget, though: in Edit mode you probably want to see the actual Position number within the list, not the position after sorting/selecting, which is what View does. So it's not just a matter of tacking on some Sorts and Refines.
Photo of Pete

Pete

  • 34 Posts
  • 19 Reply Likes
bderoes -- I started thinking small because I'm willing to settle. I'd be happy to get alphabetical sorting back, because having only two options (List Order and Date Added) in EDIT mode has made my life miserable.
Photo of Michael Ware

Michael Ware

  • 3 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled My Lists.

Why can't we print our lists without the pictures anymore. They took away that option. Is there still anyway to do it?
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
Not within IMDb-provided features, but...

Another user created a bookmarklet to view title lists without any thumbnails or details:
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/update-to-list-pages?utm_source=notification&utm_medium=...

It works very well. (Thanks again Jeorj!)
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 99 Posts
  • 34 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Thanks IMDb Technical Staff.

Though 'drag-and-drop' was the ideal means of editing/updating user-lists, it is great to see the number-editing system is now working across the board. It is more labor intensive but at least it gives the user the ability to position titles complimentary to the layout of a particular list.
As far as that fix is concerned, I am grateful.

P.S: In context, here is an example of a list that is applicable to title-placement: "2018: A Movie Odyssey" - http://www.imdb.com/list/ls000643238/ 

Thanks for all your effort, and a Happy New Year.
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 676 Posts
  • 337 Reply Likes
  • "GS" or "Get Sat" for Get Satisfaction
  • "ATS" for Advanced Title Search
  • "ANS" for Advanced Name Search
  • "WAB" for Without a Box
There are probably some other uncommon acronyms that might be common around the IMDb community's discussion venues.
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 99 Posts
  • 34 Reply Likes
Hi Jeorj Euler

Acronyms, for the most part, are easy to decipher in context of the subject discussed in a thread or post, especially when directly associated with IMDb itself. Besides my post above, I think difficulties can arise when acronyms are used from an external source that not everyone is familiar with. I think an easy way to solve this, if an acronym is used multiple times, is to state what it's meaning is when it first appears, followed by the abbreviated version.
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 7111 Posts
  • 5621 Reply Likes
@Jeorj Euler
Thanks for the acronym list. It is very useful for those less familiar with this ongoing discussion on Get Satisfaction (GS).

@Dr-Faustus
It is good practice to spell out an acronym on first use and include the acronym in parenthesis, much as I did in responding to @Jeorj Euler above.
Photo of Denise

Denise

  • 22 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
Good suggestion: it is good practice to spell out an acronym on first use in an email or document then use the acronym later on.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
What would be really nice: a bookmarklet that would insert the text
Advanced Title Search (ATS)
And maybe it could be an active link to 
http://www.imdb.com/search/title

I'd also like the moon, and world peace.
Photo of Dawid Wnuk

Dawid Wnuk

  • 2 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
From the lists FAQ:
"How can I move list items without drag and drop?
On the list you want to reorder, click the 3 vertical dots and select "Edit" from the menu. Once the page loads, replace the position numbers of those items in the desired order and select "Done" and then select "Save" when the pop up window is displayed.
For example, to move an item that is currently at #5 in the list order to #1, replace the number 5 with the number 1. Click "Done" at the top of the screen, then "Save".  The page will refresh with the new order."
You... you gotta be kidding me. This extract reads like an April Fool's Day joke.

Going from a fairly modern solution to something I have last seen in the 1990s? If you indeed employ a UX/UI designer he is either very busy with other projects, very ashamed or very overpaid.
Now get his (or a new one's) attention and fix this before this goes viral and everyone will need to explain it to their bosses.

When you do I will came back to curating my lists, since as it is the day is too short for me to accomplish this.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
@IMDb staff:
The Lists FAQ that Dawid Wnuk cites is horrible advice. Here's what's wrong:
On the list you want to reorder, click the 3 vertical dots and select "Edit" from the menu. Once the page loads, replace the position numbers of those items in the desired order and select "Done" and then select "Save" when the pop up window is displayed.
For example, to move an item that is currently at #5 in the list order to #1, replace the number 5 with the number 1. Click "Done" at the top of the screen, then "Save".  The page will refresh with the new order
While the directions are "accurate", they send you OUT of list Edit mode. For people who want to change multiple titles, but want to do them one (or a few) at a time, this is a lot of extra time wasted.

Instead, after entering the new position number, I would advise:
'Click "SAVE LIST ORDER" and the page will refresh with the new order.'

If the user wants to exit, they can find the Done button on their own (or just leave the Edit mode).
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 676 Posts
  • 337 Reply Likes
Hi, Dawid Wnuk and bderoes. You two might want to repeat those same messages of yours over at the "New IMDb Help hub" topic. I'm not sure, but please consider it.
Photo of Col Needham

Col Needham, Official Rep

  • 5261 Posts
  • 1923 Reply Likes
You two might want to repeat those same messages of yours over at the "New IMDb Help hub"topic. I'm not sure, but please consider it.
No need to report separately as the team directly responsible for this feature are already reading (and acting upon) this thread, thanks. 
Photo of Dawid Wnuk

Dawid Wnuk

  • 2 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
@bderoes, you are right of course, there are discrepancies. My point however was mostly that the new "method" of rearranging lists is absurdly non-user-friendly. Fixing the description will help people realise this faster and easier, but this is pretty much all it solves :(
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 676 Posts
  • 337 Reply Likes
Let us hope that things are synchronized, Col Needham.
Photo of Bahr

Bahr

  • 53 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled List Extracter Changes - Title in Original Language.

Recently IMDB changed their list extraction via MS Excel. In the new extract / download three major changes occurred.

1. Title Language - is now always in original language but not as per preferred title language settings. Can this be changed back to the title in preferred language

2. Your Ratings - the own ratings are no longer part of the extract / download. Can this be added back

3. Title Type - Title Types are no longer displayed as "Feature Film", "Documentary", ... but rather "Movie" and other.

Point 1 and 2 are rather significant and I wanted to ask if it can be fixed please?
Photo of Bahr

Bahr

  • 53 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
I see that "Your Ratings" is already addressed and will be fixed. I did not see any comments regarding how the title is being displayed in the download. Non-english movies are now showing with the original title in the extract only independent of your personal settings regarding title language. I would appreciate if the personal settings could be considered in the extract too please.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
I just posted an Idea saying this:
I have a list with 590 titles. It's in no particular order because the Refine and Sort options are sufficient for my purposes...UNTIL...                                                                                                              
I needed to edit the comment on one film. Now I don't know where the title IS to get to it in the Editor. If I had the Refine and Sort features IN the Editor, it would be easy.                                                   
I don't want to go to the Title page and unhook it from the list and re-add it. Then I'd lose my Comments, which might have markup codes not copyable from outside the Editor.                                       
So now, either in View mode or in Edit mode, I have to page through the list and ctrl-F to find the title. Fortunately the list has only 6 such pages. Pity the fan who put comments on a 6000 title list and didn't PUT it in order!                                                                                                                                
If you are NOT going to add Refine/Sort inside the Editor sometime SOON, please provide a way to see the true POSITION number within the list (other than Export) after Refine/Sorting in View Mode, or perhaps after searching in ATS (Advanced Title Search).
If you'd like to vote for it, or add comments like "Bring back Compact View!", you can find it here:
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/need-position-numbers-of-titles-in-a-list
Photo of ROTHMANMAX

ROTHMANMAX

  • 9 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled "Check in" list missing..

My "check in" list has been missing recently (past 2- weeks approx). Anyone know what might be the issue. I am from Sydney, Australia.

When I click on "Lists" under my user name no lists are visible.

I have attached a screen shot.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes

  • 395 Posts
  • 368 Reply Likes
@ROTHMANMAX

Look at your Activity Page (dropdown menu, upper right corner of almost every IMDb page). You can find a link there.
Don't know if they'll be adding it back in to the List of Lists page.
(Edited)
Photo of ROTHMANMAX

ROTHMANMAX

  • 9 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Thanks bderoes!
Photo of Ben Friedman

Ben Friedman

  • 1 Post
  • 4 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Editing Lists Problem.

Up until recently I loved that I was able to change the order of films in a list to customize to how I wanted it. I did this by dragging the the movie to a new spot in the order. I'm not sure why but this function was removed, now I have to type in the spot on the list where I want it to be. It was a lot easier before. Can anything be done to fix this?
Photo of Cameron Johnson

Cameron Johnson

  • 2 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled IMDb lists.

I used to have fun casually making silly lists for myself, as well as watchlists, schedules and Best of Year lists for my work as a buff and critic.Fist off, the format gobbles up memory like an SOB. This is bad for me, because I make long lists and have RAM issues. The pages take so long to load, render and process activity, and sometimes crash. I have to be careful when I scroll, because doing that often freezes my computer solid for 2-4 minutes, then slows it to a crawl afterwards.I blame the above issue on there now being title buttons and rating abilities in the editing phase. Why? This essentially ensures that the list items are embedded upon their addition, and that managing them from there is hell.That blasted checkbox!!! Like an incompetent dictator, it rules list arrangement with its idiocy, joining with "Change" buttons to refresh already slow-acting pages to shift things. Changing an item's position requires selecting that box, typing the item's new rank, and selecting "Save List Order". You no longer drag the item up or down, and change only one's position at a time. It's some of the most amateur and perfunctory arrangement formatting I've ever worked with.I'm too worn out and angry to even try going into what I think about typing notes under my items. Jst rest assured that everything about the list-making process is much, much, much worse. It feels like a nightmare, quite frankly. For years, making lists has been my main connection to IMDB, and now O'm fixing to take my business to Letterboxd. IMDB, return the old format, improve the new, or quietly go to hell. If not, I at least got to vent as publicly as I wanted to.

Note: This conversation was created from a reply on: New List Editing Format.