Sugg: Firsts of Cinema in the 2010s

  • 1
  • Idea
  • Updated 4 weeks ago
  • (Edited)
This past decade stood on the shoulders of the giants of cinema and was, therefore, able to reach new heights, some probably unimaginable before 2010. Below are some of the movies that embodied some of the most noteworthy new heights: which one do think reached the farthest?

List: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls097303737/
Poll: TBD

(Like always, suggestions welcome and appreciated.)
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes

Posted 1 month ago

  • 1
Photo of Gitte Løyche

Gitte Løyche

  • 961 Posts
  • 2030 Reply Likes
'Hidden Figures' was great!
Photo of mihailo.razvigor

mihailo.razvigor

  • 249 Posts
  • 445 Reply Likes
Hmm... wasn't Supergirl (1984) the first major female-led superhero movie? It had a budget of $35m, which is $87m in 2019 money. There's also Catwoman (2004) - in that film, she is a superhero, not a villain - which had a budget of $100m ($135m in today's money).
Of course, both of those films bombed hard, so I guess Wonder Woman is the first successful major female-led superhero movie?
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
Thank you for the info: I know close to nothing about superhero movies. Yes, I guess the first successful one -- I knew there was something, lol.  Seriously, I was going to research it better but it's 6 am and I haven't slept more than two hours and I wanted to get something down to remind me of the direction. Ah, I remember another thing: it not only starred a woman but it was directed by a woman (although not quite f-rated). Thanks, again! That was a big help. 
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 1275 Posts
  • 1960 Reply Likes
My definition is from Lexico which is powered by Oxford https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/live_action which
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
Comic book movie experts: if you read the text for the three superhero movies and 'Joker,' do you have any feedback? I did a good amount of research and got some information from others on this thread (thank you, Mihailo) but I'd love another fact-check for any of these four films. Thank you!
Photo of mihailo.razvigor

mihailo.razvigor

  • 249 Posts
  • 445 Reply Likes
I'm a bit confused about the Black Panther entry. You wrote that it's ''The first superhero film in which all superheroes are black''. But in that film, there is only one superhero - Black Panther. There are other black heroes in the film, allies of Black Panther, who are prolific fighters (Okoye, M'Baku, Nakia and Shuri - via her technology), and therefore, could somehow be consider superheroic. However, the character Everet Ross is also a heroic combatant, ally of Black Panther, but he is played by the very much white Martin Freeman.
So, by that logic, this film either has one superhero (Black Panther) or six (5 black, 1 white).

(Edited)
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
I thought I read that somewhere but I don't remember the source or even if I read it at all. Anyway, I changed the description. Thank you!
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 6907 Posts
  • 8540 Reply Likes
Under Lady Bird, I think it should say "triple F-rated", not just "F-rated".
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
Thanks for catching that, Peter. 
Photo of mihailo.razvigor

mihailo.razvigor

  • 249 Posts
  • 445 Reply Likes
Ruby, your Black Panther entry is still only half-correct:
The first superhero film to be led by a person of color.
There were black superhero films before it, the most successful being Blade, starring Wesley Snipes, a full 20 years before Black Panther! In fact, it went on to become a trilogy. And I don't know if an average movie-watcher knows this, but Blade is a Marvel Comics superhero. Yes, Marvel actually made a film with a leading black man before they would make X-Men, Avengers and Fantastic Four films. That was quite progressive back in the day, even though Blade is often forgotten in that regard.
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
Hmm, I will have to revise it again. Thanks very much. :)
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 1275 Posts
  • 1960 Reply Likes
How are Elle, The Florida Project and  Get Out the first in a category? You don't explain it on the list.
(Edited)
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
I just didn't get to those yet, hence the "Under Construction" note, although Elle and Florida Project may not stay depending on what I find out when I fact-check them. Actually, that applies to 'Get Out' too and, of course, any of the options. I'm not in any hurry. It's only mid November. 
(Edited)
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
I also didn't write the description for 'Tree of Life' because that first is more nuanced so will take more time. I'm still not sure how I'm going to approach that one. Aspects of 'The Florida Project' firsts are also pretty nuanced but I may only mention the clear-cut one if it is as unusual as I think it is.
(Edited)
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 1275 Posts
  • 1960 Reply Likes
How can "live-action" be CGI by definition? It is impossible.

Definition: live ac·tion/ˌlīv ˈakSH(ə)n/

noun
noun: live action


  1. (in filmmaking) action involving real people or animals, as contrasted with animation or computer-generated effects.
    "a live-action version of the cartoon"








Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
What's the source of that definition? I'm not questioning you at all but what I do, if anything, depends on the reliability of the source and its authority. Tomorrow I will try to get to the unexpurgated Oxford but it's snowing here so I'm not sure if I'll be able to. I realized that I have "live-action" in quotes but perhaps it needs something more. My students would tell you that there are precious few things as important to me than precision, lol, so I'll think on this.

I try not to let my biases into polls like this but that's not a risk here: I have no skin in this game, as in film. I had no interest in seeing this film, didn't in fact see it, and I'm not a big Disney fan. My students would be thrilled at this chance to castigate me for not keeping a record of my sources; I have no simple way to test my source. 
(Edited)
Photo of mihailo.razvigor

mihailo.razvigor

  • 249 Posts
  • 445 Reply Likes
In RubyFruit's list, the term ''live action'' is in quotation marks.
That's the point of the entry - it is animated, but aims to be live-action, because of its photo-realistic CGI.

(Edited)
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 1275 Posts
  • 1960 Reply Likes
Still, This is a marketing thing that Disney did to sell the movie.
Photo of rubyfruit76

rubyfruit76, Champion

  • 5042 Posts
  • 6034 Reply Likes
That doesn't necessarily mean that it's not true, though. 
(Edited)
Photo of leavey-2

leavey-2

  • 1982 Posts
  • 1628 Reply Likes
Photo of mihailo.razvigor

mihailo.razvigor

  • 249 Posts
  • 445 Reply Likes
Does Boyhood fit the criteria? It was purposefully in production for 12 years, with the characters aging with their actors. What I want to say is, it was an artistic choice to film it for 12 years, rather than production problems.
(Edited)