Rae Sunshine Lee issues not resolved

  • 1
  • Problem
  • Updated 1 month ago
  • In Progress
  • (Edited)
Will,
if
you  look at her bio it states that she was a child model in the 1960's.
So that would make her somewhere between 6-16 years old.


If this is to be believed, then how does a 6-16 year old become a researcher on Star Trek (1967) or The Beverly Hillbilly's (1965). Her other researcher credits below are suspect too because she would have been still quite young. All of these cannot be verified, but common sense dictates that they are more than likely false if you use the Occam's Razor Theory of Deductive reasoning.



Now these topics if you take the time to read them show that Rae Sunshine Lee has had credits removed and these topics have rather misleading titles.
They are supporting research to have credits Removed. Not Retained.

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/evidence-in-support-of-rae-sunshine-lee-credit-corrections
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/-how-to-eat-like-a-child-photo-in-support-of-assigning-sunsh...
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/rae-sunshine-lee
These are by Bob The Moo
He also has many submissions for Rae, but non of them address the 1950's thru the 1970's credits. Apparently Bob TM Knows Rae personally.
This topic was rather large and even Bob TM admitted that he may have been a little lenient on accepting her word for certain credits and reversed himself. This is the Topic..........
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/evidence-in-support-of-rae-sunshine-lee-credit-corrections

His Post.....


In conclusion after reading all the topics thoroughly, I believe that a certain percentage of her work from 1980 and up is valid. 1979 and down, not so much. It is clear that there is obvious credit padding. An audit of those older credits would seem to be in order.
If you would like I can resubmit another contribution that addresses the 1970 and older credits only, as these are the most suspect. There may be additional padding of credits from 1980 and up, but I don't care to do that much work looking into it. I trust Bob TMoo's work, but it has been 5 years since that topic of his, so who knows what and who has added credits to her page. If it was done by bob the moo then that would be good. But those not done by him might need a little scrutiny.

Thanks
Ed
:)

Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16414 Reply Likes

Posted 2 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
Further evidence Beverly Hillbilly's
As can be seen Rae is the only researcher ever used in the entire series run.



Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
Excuse the mistake 2 submissions above Rachael "Renick" should be "Renish"
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
Conclusion to be drawn is that all her acting credits in the 1960's probably should have an "(Uncredited)(as Rachael Renish)" attributes.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
Will re-submit contributions if you so advise.
Thanks
Ed
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
Above I made a reference to her being between 6-16. In 1960 in this Twilight Zone episode I believe this is Rachael. She looks like she may be 6-9 years old.

Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
Conclusion from the above photo is that her researcher credits are highly suspect.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
Don't forget to expand the string above. Thanks
Photo of Will

Will, Official Rep

  • 3679 Posts
  • 4519 Reply Likes
Thanks for the additional details Ed, we do have a ticket open to investigate.

Thanks,
Will
Photo of J.

J.

  • 349 Posts
  • 526 Reply Likes
She's not credited in The Beverly Hillbillies: Cool School Is Out.

https://youtu.be/BnmQazyPAUI?t=1297
Photo of J.

J.

  • 349 Posts
  • 526 Reply Likes
And she's not credited in The Beverly Hillbillies: Clampett-a-Go-Go.

https://youtu.be/gqwKWeTI3bM?t=1305
Photo of MikeTheWhistle

MikeTheWhistle

  • 531 Posts
  • 673 Reply Likes
and she shows being born in 1955 but here is a credit for 4/1/1954. She wouldn't have even been conceived yet. lol


Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
The thing about this is this is the 4th time. Hopefully they get it correct on this try!
Photo of MikeTheWhistle

MikeTheWhistle

  • 531 Posts
  • 673 Reply Likes
sorry. i didn't see the one i listed above or maybe it was in a different thread. They've obviously still not decided though as the credits i read about above are still out there but this is a holiday week as well.
It certainly puts a taint on data in general in that people put bad data out there and some will stick simply by the law of #s. not sure why they do it, but it can be entertaining.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 14378 Posts
  • 16416 Reply Likes
It is disheartening to see this kind of abuse from someone of "My generation". I too was born in 1955. But while I now reside in the L.A. area, I have a different upbringing that centers me with a sense of right and wrong. After seeing what I see here, it would be so easy to circumvent this system for my own personal gain. But would never do it. And from what I have seen of Rachel's work history, she need not have padded her work credits here. Her real work is enough credit as is. It's a shame.