Poll Suggestion: The Ultimate Cinematic Sequence

  • 2
  • Idea
  • Updated 1 month ago
  • (Edited)
Watching movies often is a matter of personal taste. But sometimes a real intense sequence in a movie has taken the breath of a wide audience. The IMDb Poll Board users are asked to find out what would have been the ultimate Sequence in a close to perfect - or simply perfect - movie.

So the rules are:
The movie should be rated by more than 50.000 (debateable) users.
The rating should be 8.0/10 or higher. (exact rating border debateable)
The sequence should be a very intense visualized sequence of image, sound and storytelling.
One user can only pick one sequence to suggest.
The user will be mentioned in the option ("Suggested by ...")
If someone has chosen exactly the option you would have suggested, agree and join the "Suggested by ..."-Line. But just on one option. Not two or more agrees.
The sequence should be exemplary for best cinematic entertainment in anyway.

The list is here:
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls045846621/
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
  • excited

Posted 2 years ago

  • 2
Photo of BONAFIDE BOSS ⭐️

BONAFIDE BOSS ⭐️

  • 2723 Posts
  • 5082 Reply Likes
Sup, folks! (those who haven't suggested yet)

Since I can't suggest more than one, please claim and add your name to these:

Note to author and reader: All of these sequences may not qualify. [ **SPOILER ALERT** ]

1. 'The Dark Knight' - ending sequence
Christian Bale in The Dark Knight 2008
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/mediaviewer/rm1409260289

2. 'Pulp Fiction' - the whole apartment sequences
Samuel L Jackson and John Travolta in Pulp Fiction 1994
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/mediaviewer/rm3998665728

3. 'Se7en' - "What's in the box"
Brad Pitt in Se7en 1995
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114369/mediaviewer/rm2491004929

4. 'Joker' - Arthur's confession
Joaquin Phoenix in Joker 2019
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7286456/mediaviewer/rm4113530881

5. 'Gladiator' - "My name is Maximum" sequence
Russell Crowe in Gladiator 2000
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0172495/mediaviewer/rm461472768

6. 'Once Upon a Time in the West' - past story revelation
Henry Fonda and Claudio Mancini in Cera una volta il West 1968
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064116/mediaviewer/rm4112275968

7. 'The Departed' - the rooftop and elevator sequence, when they finally meet
Image: -/- (sorry couldn't find an HD image)

8.'Dangal' - the last game sequence
Fatima Sana Shaikh in Dangal 2016
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5074352/mediaviewer/rm1085239552

8. 'Django Unchained' - the handshake sequence 
- Image: -/- (sorry couldn't find an image of that particular scene)

9. 'Oldboy' - the end sequence: when he reveals who he is and what's the relationship between that girl and Dae-su Oh
- Image: -/- (sorry the image(s) contains heavy spoilers)

10. 'The Shining' - Grady sequence
Philip Stone in The Shining 1980
- Image: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/mediaviewer/rm4244003328
- There are many other sequences from 'The Shining'

I hope at least one of these qualify, lol.
(Edited)
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
Bo:
Normally I would say thank you, but it destroys my idea. I wanted the people to make their own thoughts on the issue and let bring only 1 thought by 1 user.  I know it's easy to use given ideas. And you may have a few thousend ideas. But that wasn't the core of the idea of the poll, I stated that before.  The users should think on their own ultimate sequence to choose one them they experienced. :( Maybe it's the lack of my conversation skills. :(
Photo of Alexander NYVKE

Alexander NYVKE

  • 1600 Posts
  • 2759 Reply Likes
Well, you rejected my suggestion for being 0.2 stars below the threshold. And you rejected someone else's for being 0.4 stars below the threshold - who is a poll board admin who pu**y-hat blocks any polls where she does not get her way.

So this whole thing is moot anyway.
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
Oswald: how low should I take the barriers? One comes with 0.2, another with 0.4 the says why not, I'm only 0.6 below. Maybe the next says then 7.4 was taken, why not my 7.0? Did you read the title exactly? It says the ultimate sequence. And for granting that it's ultimate, I've put the barrs high, yes! Otherwise this idea wouldn't do. Look, there are 14 people who found sequences that match the criteria. You won't tell me now, that you won't find any other ultimate sequence on yourself. Stomping on the ground doesn't help.

Ok, I tell you (Quote):
The rating should be 8.0/10 or higher. (exact rating border debateable)
EoQ.

When I wrote that I didn't mean, it can be lower. I thought that the border can be higher, if wanted. You don't have to be mean, if you don't get the idea. Your IMDb-user is NVanKerr, right?
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/poll-suggestion-face-off-blindspot-big-bads
(look at the list, user)
You already got one suggestion on the list. Do you want to change it?
(Edited)
Photo of Alexander NYVKE

Alexander NYVKE

  • 1600 Posts
  • 2759 Reply Likes
No, I just want to bi**h and moan, because I am a curmudgeon.
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
Ok, I take this as a yes. So?
Photo of Alexander NYVKE

Alexander NYVKE

  • 1600 Posts
  • 2759 Reply Likes
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/poll-suggestion-face-off-man-of-science-vs-man-of-faith?topi...

You can note the "Lost" reference in the intro without having a title that dismisses the biggest social minority in the world. Of course, you can also keep it as it is but I will always oppose it as it is now. I do not at all like how sexist this board has become recently. 

- Rubyfruit, Emphasis Mine.

This poll will _never_ go live until and unless tootie-fruit gets her 7.6. And by extension you will have to give me my 7.8.
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
And what the hell has the qoute you've put out of your hat to do with this poll idea? I can't remember to ever have recieved such words from her. Please don't abuse her Quotes on me. The quote you mention has got nothing to do with me. If the poll doesn't go online, then it doesn't. But I don't change my mind, especially not if someone tries to use rude behavior like that on me.
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
And what the hell has the qoute you've put out of your hat to do with this poll idea? I can't remember to ever have recieved such words from her. Please don't abuse her Quotes on me. The quote you mention has got nothing to do with me. If the poll doesn't go online, then it doesn't. But I don't change my mind, especially not if someone tries to use rude behavior like that on me.
Photo of Alexander NYVKE

Alexander NYVKE

  • 1600 Posts
  • 2759 Reply Likes
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 7480 Posts
  • 9924 Reply Likes
Hi, Oswald. If what you've stated about a particular admin is true, then that's useful information. Thanks! There is still the problem of not being able to get the other side of the story, without a full investigation, which nobody on here has sufficient resources (and time) to conduct. Let us just hope that this person's behavior (according to conjecture) improves. That's the best we an hope for, since finding somebody to fill the vacancy in the event of a vacancy being somehow created might be really hard to do. Also, as you know, it is unruly to go around here calling fellow participants of the forum out of their respective preferred names/handles, so it might be great to tone down the contemptuousness.
Photo of Jessica

Jessica, Champion

  • 4425 Posts
  • 5490 Reply Likes
Oswald,

You are providing misleading and false information about Ruby. Please be more careful when choosing your words.
Photo of Alexander NYVKE

Alexander NYVKE

  • 1600 Posts
  • 2759 Reply Likes
Jessica,

It's a direct quote, with a link to the originating post.
Photo of Jessica

Jessica, Champion

  • 4425 Posts
  • 5490 Reply Likes
I didn't mean the quote (which by the way is completely irrelevant to this poll).
And you rejected someone else's for being 0.4 stars below the threshold - who is a poll board admin who pu**y-hat blocks any polls where she does not get her way.
This poll will _never_ go live until and unless tootie-fruit gets her 7.6. 
You are making it sound like she would prevent this poll from going live if Breu doesn't add her suggestion.

She was just expressing an opinion, and here is something else she said on page 1 of this thread:

"That said, I completely respect your inclusion criteria and will go with the sequence that is from a film that meets those guidelines"
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 7480 Posts
  • 9924 Reply Likes
How is it even possible for somebody who is not IMDb staff to block a poll from going live? If it is possible, then how could we be sure that somebody who fits the criterion has not, does not and, more importantly, would not commit such a blocking? I confess that I do not really know anybody around here very well, but I have observed some suspicious behaviors (or mere sentiments) by just about anybody who has here had public complaints lodged against him or her. That being stated, there are a number of champions whom I have never observed any complaints against whatsoever.
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 8321 Posts
  • 10913 Reply Likes
Let me suggest a classic, the "mirage" scene from Lawrence of Arabia.

 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056172/mediaviewer/rm11678464
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
Peter:
Thank you, I'll put it on the list.
Photo of Ardan Tüzünsoy

Ardan Tüzünsoy

  • 164 Posts
  • 345 Reply Likes
I think the problem is the rules: "rating should be 8.0 or higher" eliminates many great movies, and also many more mediocre / bad movies that have great cinematic sequences. With "8.0 or more", you're left with only a handful of truly great films, plus a lot of Dark Knights, Avengers, etc. Fan favorites but nothing special, really.

The first one that comes to my mind is the chase scene, the greatest chase scene IMO, from The French Connection with 7.7. Another one is from Evil Dead 2, with its 7.8 rating. When I first saw it I thought it was the greatest scene I ever saw, and many years later it still looks tremendous: The unseen spirit following the hero through the trees, through the windows of a car, and through many rooms of a house, and finally pulling back to the starting point, in a single continuous scene.

We should not forget the scene starting with Michael Keaton getting locked out of his own theater play in the middle of the performance, then walking around the whole building in his underwear to get back to the play, in the 7.7-rated (proof that most people either don't understand cinema, or have very poor taste) Birdman. This scene itself was worthy of the Oscar.

Or how about the opening sequence of Aguirre, the Wrath of God?

Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
I must admit, that there is some truth in it. The mere problem is exact what you say. First I thought about the top250-list and their best scenes. But there were so many top-250-list-suggestions at that time, that I wanted to include some more than only the top-250-list suggestion. But not too low. And that's the problem.

Let's say 7.8. The next says come on 7.7. Ok, lets do 7.7. The next says come on 7.5. Ok, we do 7.5 the next comes and says why not 7.2 and so on and so on. Until the list shows a sequence from a dull and boring movies, because they match the criteria with a user-given average 7.0/10

With 8.0 there might be still a few hundrets or maybe thousends of worthy movies listed on IMDb. If someone has good ideas to change the criteria in a way that it's a good sequence of a good movie (granted), we can talk about. But I don't want cheap sequences in that suggestion, that I have to only put on the list, because they match the (too low) criteria. That would also destroy the idea. Maybe the idea really is not viable, because of how you say Qoute: "(proof that most people either don't understand cinema, or have very poor taste)".

I don't like Kinski on a honoring list, because according to news, he seems to have abused his kids,  but I learned that for some users it's ok to put him on a list. What should I think about that? I don't like him, even though he seemed to be an acting genius to many people. This is a honring list. We honor our ultimate cinematic sequences, when we give that poll a chance.

Back to the main issue:
What should be the average rating? How high or low should it be to grant good sequences? Please everybody give me your ideas. Maybe this can be a good idea of all users with constructive ideas. I stay with the suggesters, who already gave their suggestion, they stay on the list. I would only change their option, if they want to. Sory for my lack of comunication skills. I hope everyone understood the core of the idea. I'll trust your measurement.
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
... good sequences ... ultimate sequences
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
... grant good sequences? ... grant ultimate sequences?
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 4428 Posts
  • 6355 Reply Likes
Sorry, I can't edit my texts, even though there was no like or other comment.
Photo of Ardan Tüzünsoy

Ardan Tüzünsoy

  • 164 Posts
  • 345 Reply Likes
If you're asking me, I'd say "don't put a limit on the rating of the suggested movies." Ratings may (or may not) give you an idea about whether the film is great or not. But for a "great / ultimate cinematic sequence" ratings aren't that relevant: like I said, a mediocre / bad movie may have a sequence that's much better than the rest of the movie. (In fact there was a topic/poll idea about this a couple of days ago, "bad movies that start off great" or something like that.) That's just my opinion, of course.

The Kinski thing is a whole other debate, and could go on much longer, and I'm not sure it belongs on this topic. But since you asked: I admire Kinski as an actor, but I also agree that he should have been burned to death for what he did.

Now that brings up a dilemma: Do we (as a society, not just movie lovers) disown artists who we discover to be perverts?

1 ) Do we disown Woody Allen, for instance? If we do, do we also disown his work? Does being a pervert make him less of an artist, or a genius? Do his movies don't count anymore?

2 ) Do we disown Clint Eastwood? According to his late wife Sondra Locke's book, he literally forced her to have an abortion, from which she never recovered mentally. Is this also not terrible behavior? I'm not arguing whether it's a crime or not, but is it not at least (in the most carefully chosen expression) bastardly behavior? To force and press a woman to have an abortion that she doesn't really want?

3 ) What if we disown Clint Eastwood, for instance, and disown all his work, but later find out that his late wife's memoirs were simply lies? Because this thing was not a court-proven thing like the Bill Cosby case, it's just one side's words against another's.

4 ) What is and is not "disownable" behavior, for lack of a better term? Is there a clear-cut line? Do we disown people proven to have slept with minors for instance, but act more lenient towards people who have merely cheated on their spouses? Drank and beaten their wives? Beaten their kids? Evaded tax? Do we play favorites when it comes to famous people's behaviors, as if to say "I can forgive this and this, but I draw the line at that one"?

5 ) What about people who are just as much of a pervert as some of the names above, but simply haven't been caught? If our favorite stars one day turn out to be perverts, are we ready to turn our backs on them? Burn our DVD sets, vow to never watch their movies again?

6 ) Anyway, are we (as movie lovers) in a position to disown anyone at all? If it's a matter for the courts, and the person is rightfully punished for whatever he did, shouldn't that be the extent of it? If your plumber goes to prison for abusing his wife, do you also say "he was a worthless plumber anyway, nothing he did ever worked!" ?

I'm not expecting any answers to these questions, I don't have answers myself. Just trying to point out that this isn't a simple issue. Even the proven, concrete cases aren't so clear: Sleeping with a 17-year old isn't the same as sleeping with a 10-year old, although they're both covered under the same name.

Kinski? His daughter was accusing him of abuse even when he was alive. He's a first rate scumbag, who makes me sick even at the mention of his name. But he was also a first-rate actor. Not really the "genius" that people make him out to be, as you mentioned, but certainly one of the greats of his art. I try to make that distinction as well as I can.
(Edited)