P.S.: The 2018 Best Picture Oscar Race Off And Running - 1st Quarter.

  • 1
  • Idea
  • Updated 2 years ago
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls023103237/
Already, some exceptionally fine films have been released in the first quarter of this year, which is odd because films released in January, February and March seldon get nominated for Best Picture come Oscar time. Should these somehow get remembered in the fall, which one would you like to see nominated for a best picture Oscar?

And since March is not over yet, you can not only discuss the topic here, you can suggest you own nominations too.

This is going to be a good year.
Photo of dgranger

dgranger

  • 2757 Posts
  • 2656 Reply Likes

Posted 2 years ago

  • 1
Photo of Stephen Atwood

Stephen Atwood

  • 2254 Posts
  • 2561 Reply Likes
Hostiles also is a 2017 film that doesn't qualify for the 2019 Oscars.  It has a limited theatrical release in USA 22 December 2017 (limited).  It doesn't qualify for next year's Oscars.  Technically, one can consider it a snub for the 2018 Oscars.

You should actually look into their respective releases before adding anymore entries.
Photo of urbanemovies

urbanemovies

  • 5462 Posts
  • 3434 Reply Likes
If you click the image and read the rule it allows for a movie to be shown as a preview or at festivals or even to released almost a full year prior to it qualifying run in LA or formerly LA/NYC. A lot movies that screen at TIFF get released in the following year and fall into next Oscars cycle. Basically, the rule makes the point you are making. IMDb seems to tags movie from the date they are first publicly shown worldwide, which is fair. But, it may not be actual release date or year it is shown in your country or locale. An extreme example would be Japan's Only Yesterday (1991) which had it "official" USA release 26 February 2016 (USA) some 25 years later. I wouldn't think the distributor of Hostiles would give up their eligibility to release ten days early in five theaters to make a couple thousands dollars. But, that is purely speculative.
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 8241 Posts
  • 10742 Reply Likes
Hostiles is on the official Reminder List for the 90th Oscars, so that settles that it was eligible this year and not next year.

http://www.oscars.org/oscars/rules-el...
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3729 Posts
  • 5168 Reply Likes
I never knew such lists existed, very interesting! 

Browsing it is very addictive for some reason. So much "what if" scenarios... 
Photo of urbanemovies

urbanemovies

  • 5462 Posts
  • 3434 Reply Likes
I found this and thought it was interesting, the Oscars has since amended the rule so the earliest a movie can be shown is the prior year (theatrically to be eligible for a 2019 Oscar a movie can be shown as early as January 1, 2017).

"Limelight (1952) is the only film to have won an award twenty years after its official release. Since it was not released in Los Angeles County until 1972, it was not eligible for any Academy Awards until that time. Limelight (1952) is the only film to have won an award twenty years after its official release. Since it was not released in Los Angeles County until 1972, it was not eligible for any Academy Awards until that time."

Charlie Chaplin won his only Oscar for this movie for Score, I am not sure which I find more shocking that he only one in his entire career or that he had to wait twenty years after the films release.
Photo of dgranger

dgranger

  • 2757 Posts
  • 2656 Reply Likes
I would say both. That just adds to my frustration with one week in Los Angeles County limited run and screeners to members of the academy qualification rule. It has lead to so many gerrymandered nominations and using the Oscar nominations as advertising for new unknown films like crazy. It really is unfair to all the films that were in general release before December.
As Chaplin goes, that man deserved multiple Oscars.
(Edited)
Photo of urbanemovies

urbanemovies

  • 5462 Posts
  • 3434 Reply Likes
I would use 2019 Oscars in the title, if you are going to use it that way. as the race for 2018 Best Picture Oscar Race ends today. I also wouldn't use first quarter in the title either, unless you want to restrict yourself to a handful of viable movies. I would think anything with 70 Metascore might be a possible candidate. I did like Hostiles though, which had a 65.

FYC
An Early Look at the Oscars 2019 Best Picture Race
The Best Oscars 2019 Best Picture Candidate, So Far
Early Favorites Oscars 2019 Best Picture Race

January/February/March Movies Movie Pool 1000 votes, 7.0+ IMDb rated
 
Hostiles (2017) 65 Metascore
Red Sparrow (2018) 54 Metascore
Black Panther (2018) 88 Metascore
Game Night (I) (2018) 66 Metascore
Annihilation (2018) 79 Metascore
A Wrinkle in Time (2018) ?? Metascore
Thoroughbreds (2017) 83 Metascore
Love, Simon (2018) 73 Metascore
Gringo (2018) ?? Metascore
Allure (2017) 70 Metascore
Isle of Dogs (2018) 83 Metascore
Final Portrait (2017) 77 Metascore
Ready Player One (2018) ?? Metascore
Outside In (2017) 85 Metascore
Gemini (2017) 77 Metascore
(Edited)
Photo of dgranger

dgranger

  • 2757 Posts
  • 2656 Reply Likes
Actually this not. The winners from the show tonight would be for 2017. It is a number thing where the best for one year is honored in an awards ceremony that actually takes place early in the following year when it comes to the Oscars. So therefore, my title is correct since the awards ceremony honoring the films of 2018 will take place in 2019 but still the awards will be considered for 2018.
Photo of urbanemovies

urbanemovies

  • 5462 Posts
  • 3434 Reply Likes
Yes, I agree it is the Best Picture Oscar Race for the best movie of 2018. Still, I don't think I will be alone in my confusion when you put Oscars and the year together in the title.I think you need to carefully word it to avoid any issues, some people will understand what you mean and others won't. I think you were confused yourself. Oscar pictures that are released one year (ie 2017) are considered 2018 Oscar nominees or 2018 Oscar Winners if they achieve that distinction. Since the ceremony is held the next year, the years never match. It has been like that for over 75 years.
, I had noticed at least three Best Picture award winners that were released in one year but won the award in the following year.
- Casablanca (1942) The 1943 winner
- Crash (2004) The 2005 winner
- The Hurt Locker (2008)The 2009 winner
(Edited)
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 8241 Posts
  • 10742 Reply Likes
There has long been confusion about the use of years to identify the Oscar ceremonies. But we have been using "Oscar 2018" in the polls to refer to last night's awards, so I agree we should avoid using 2018 in reference to the next awards.

An alternative: The 91st Oscars
(Edited)