Keywords scenes, scene and one-scene

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 4 weeks ago
  • Answered
  • (Edited)
Can a staffer please delete the keywords scene (https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=scene) and scenes (https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=scenes) and block them? Keywords in plural aren't allowed, which would mean 'scenes' should be merged into 'scene'. But because literally every title has a scene in it, this keyword doesn't serve any purpose.

Also, I feel the keyword one-scene (https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=one-scene) should be merged into the keyword consisting-entirely-of-one-scene (https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=consisting-entirely-of-one-scene). Can a staffer do this please and re-route any instances of one-scene in the future?




Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1198 Posts
  • 1482 Reply Likes

Posted 4 weeks ago

  • 1
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 17455 Posts
  • 19821 Reply Likes
Marco???
What if the movie is about someone who is making a movie. And the word "scene' is important to the plot as a keyword? Or in a looser sense, the description "she was so drunk she created a 'scene' in the restaurant" (US Slang) for a problem.
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1198 Posts
  • 1482 Reply Likes
Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree about these keywords being pointless or not. You are of course right, you are not obliged to explain why you feel they aren't pointless, but you not having to explain this doesn't have anything to do with how Will or IMDb feels about these keywords.

I agree the removal of the message boards was necessary, I stated before on GetSat that I am aware of this. However, it was said by IMDb that GetSat would also lead to better communication between staff and contributors. This has not been my experience at all I'm afraid.

Obviously, elimination doesn't fix the whole problem regarding keywords, but it does help a little bit if pointless keywords get deleted or merged into proper keywords.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 17455 Posts
  • 19821 Reply Likes
You are of course right, you are not obliged to explain why you feel they aren't pointless
Hey, I was referring to Will. Not me. He need not justify or explain anything to any of us. He is going by an unalterable set of rules. To explain every little concern or question by repeating what another contributor has already stated is counter productive. While you might not like the result. accept it and move forward.
Nikolay and I provided an obvious answer that he agreed with. End of story. He disagreed that any of your suggestions needed to be applied. It's as simple as that.
Do you really have a need to be told the same thing twice?
I'm sure you will agree that it is not necessary.
Nikolay and I made a reasonable hypothesis that turned out to be IMDb policy.
Will agreed. No Changes as suggested by you.
(Edited)
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1198 Posts
  • 1482 Reply Likes
Nikolay and I made a reasonable hypothesis that turned out to be IMDb policy.

So plural keywords are okay now? I say this because 'scenes' is still around, even though Will gave a like to Nikolay, who stated that 'scenes' (as well as 'one-scene') should probably be merged and deleted. See, these likes aren't as helpful as you make them out to be.
And another question that goes unanswered: Are all ambiguous keywords allowed now? And how would that be in accordance with allowing "visitors to easily search and discover titles"? How is a keyword helpful if you can't know what it refers to? See, Will was fast on this thread with pushing two buttons and you were fast in stating there's nothing more to talk about because Will pushed two buttons, but a lot of questions still haven't been and - probably - won't be answered.
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3071 Posts
  • 4020 Reply Likes
Marco, they are eligible in some cases such as one of my favorite IMDb keywords: unexplained-events. One might argue that it might be changed to unexplained-event, but we have a lot of titles in which there are multiple unexplained events. 
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1198 Posts
  • 1482 Reply Likes
One might argue that it might be changed to unexplained-event, but we have a lot of titles in which there are multiple unexplained events.

There are also quite a lot of titles that feature multiple trains, but according to the guide " trains should be train"...
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3071 Posts
  • 4020 Reply Likes
Expanding on what Ed said I sat on this thought a lot and there ought to be some use for keyword "scene". Especially since it is also an architectural term. It's a loose keyword, but I can imagine several uses for it. And I totally forgot about that (a busy month can do it, I guess) but I used that very keyword myself this very month: "Notes on the Scene" (2017) was added by me.  

As for "one-scene" and "scenes" these should probably be merged and deleted. 
Photo of Adrian

Adrian, Champion

  • 1262 Posts
  • 1501 Reply Likes
I'm thinking it should be more descriptive than "scene" as that really doesn't tell me much as there are several uses for it. For example, Ed's case above should be "causing-a-scene". I haven't seen "Notes on the Scene" so I can't comment. I mostly agree with Marco that it is too generic of a term to really be useful.
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1198 Posts
  • 1482 Reply Likes
I can imagine several uses for it.

So how can a user of the site know which meaning is meant by the keyword? And if a user doesn't know which meaning is meant, how is the keyword useful?
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 17455 Posts
  • 19821 Reply Likes
And to all that reads this. My feeling is that keywords are nearly useless as a whole. I feel that 80% of them are misapplied.
I will not reply any further on this either.
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1198 Posts
  • 1482 Reply Likes
My feeling is that keywords are nearly useless as a whole. I feel that 80% of them are misapplied.

Do you think your responses have helped get things slightly more to a percentage of 79% misapplied or perhaps to 81% misapplied? Or don't you care about keywords at all but nevertheless felt the need to talk about them?