Is the accuracy of contributors calculated by category or has an whole?

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 2 months ago
Is the accuracy of the contributors by category?:
Example: Filmography, Title, Mini-Bio.
So it makes it harder to add Mini-Bio if you haven't done one before.

or as a whole, so IMDb look at you total accuracy, and even if you didn't make any Mini-Bio before, it is more likely to be accepted, because you have contributed a lot on the Filmography
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 1766 Posts
  • 2602 Reply Likes

Posted 2 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 21255 Posts
  • 25164 Reply Likes
So it makes it harder to add Mini-Bio if you haven't done one before.
My very first ever submission to IMDb was a biography.
It was approved in less than 24 hours. So no, it makes no difference if it is your first or hundredth.
What they DO look at is your rejections. If you constantly provide information that is getting rejected at a higher than normal rate, you could find yourself on the list of contributors that require a higher level of proof to get your submissions approved.

I have added 10 titles of my own that I found were not in the database.(Missing) All but one approved.
1 was rejected. Was attempting to help someone here on get satisfaction. The info they supplied was denied. It was a compilation of episodes edited and turned into a direct to video title. Neither the OP nor I could get it through.
So I have really had no issues with overlong waits or rejections.

:):)


(Edited)
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 1766 Posts
  • 2602 Reply Likes
I don't have that many rejections.

I know that it seems a lot when you see three complaints in one day, but 119 of my contributions were accepted only today (0 Rejection) (1 Pending). ( (I have been in fire this week) (I have found the strategy). You can say that between 90% and 98% of my daily contributions are accepted. My worst day ever is 3 February 2020, 3 out of 5 got rejected.

1) Birth Date of Dean-Charles Chapman
2) Marriage Date of Nicolas Winding Refn
3) Mini-Bio of Dean-Charles Chapman

The only 2 accepted were
Ozark (keyword: Ozark mountains)
Parasite (Review)
Photo of Eboy

Eboy

  • 1721 Posts
  • 2231 Reply Likes
I would say that ”rejections” can basically happen to anyone (yes, even to veteran contributors), so there’s no reason to fear them. It’s good to remember that rejection doesn’t necessarily mean that the info is wrong or somehow ”dubious”. A bit more work and/or sources/links are needed in some cases, that’s all. Sometimes that one screenshot or one (good) link can change ”rejection” to ”approved”. Some people are simply just lazy (or let’s say, too impatient) to provide sources like screenshots (sorry, nothing personal, since I can understand that to some degree).

It’s basically all good if the (submitted) credits/info is decently researched and written, confirmed by the best of your knowledge at the time - and submitted without any dubious intentions. Rest is up to the IMDb data editors. Sometimes you just need that one more screenshot, link or source.

I would say that IMDb tracks more of people’s contributions in the long run. If other people have to constantly correct or challenge the (submitted) credits/info, it could be a red flag that something is wrong. Maybe that person doesn’t provide good info. Maybe there’s an agenda. Maybe the person doesn’t fully know what he/she’s doing when it comes to IMDb. Maybe there’s an PR/resume/CV/agent/publishing agency angle (in a bad way, that is). Rejection is one thing, but wrong credits/info that is added to the site is another. Former often just means: ”We just need more info/links/sources, please”.
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 1766 Posts
  • 2602 Reply Likes
I just wanted to know if the categories were related because I have way more facility to get Filmography approved than other categories. 

My real problem is that because of rejections in other categories than Filmography, I'm limiting myself to adding cast/crew to soap opera.

It gives me a ton of contributions, but it is becoming boring.