- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Posted 8 months ago
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
Hi.
To quote you above.
I was maliciously digitally assaulted by a fellow film student who in turn, to damage my credibility, hacked my account and added their fraudulent material that they created.So, if you were digitally assaulted, then was there a Police Report?
For any action to be taken at all you would be better served to use the contact us method.
Anything you post here will be visible to the whole internet.
Your proof will need to be sent here....https://help.imdb.com/contact
Select the Fan and Contributor....Other, then other, just like in the screen shot below.

- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
I will also contact the link you mentioned.
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
This is the person that provided the content. (See Pic Below)
DO NOT provide any more info here.
You have been informed that any thing you say here goes out worldwide.
This warning is also available for viewing on the page you used to start this post.
Take my advice please. Post no more here.

- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
As well, who is responsible for handling the material on this community? It would appear there were IMDB employees and representatives involved (see attached photos) who are very much part of the community , the conversation and the actions of it.
Also, who is responsible for managing the "Code of Conduct" as stated in the terms (as per attached image) for this community? Or should it be known that anyone can post anything about anyone with evidence or validation? In essence, what's the point of posting "Terms" when it is a free for all.



- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Everything you post here is visible.
Best to be safe than sorry.
There has to be a proven willful intent to prove harm.
The burden of proof in a legal proceeding is on the plaintiff.
You are citing cite rules.
You are not citing Practiced Law or any statute that is applicable in any state or Federal Statutes.
And your time is up and no action needs to be taken.
The post will stay as stands.

- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
1) Why have "Terms" for the cite when they are not abided by, and
2) The posting party is the plaintiff as they are accusing harm done to them by me, without proof.
As well, sorry to say but Statute of Limitation begins "...when the harmful event, such as fraud or injury, occurs or when it is discovered." and discovery as only be recent.
Therefore, there is no proof that Grant O'Kane is involved or was the actual party who acted in a fraudulent manner or act the IMDb Community is allowing to remain posted and that the IMDb Community and Get Satisfaction (getsatisfaction.com) website does not abide by their own Terms of Service and supports false, fraudulent and malicious activity going against their own Term #4. Code of Conduct specifically; 4.2.1 Abuse, harassment, threats, flaming or intimidation of any person or organization and 4.2.4 Providing information that is false, misleading or inaccurate.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
DO NOT DISCUSS THIS POST AND IT'S CONTENTS
TAKE NO POSITION.
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
No position relating to the two year old posting should be referenced here.
It is old news. We need not make it become fresh news.
This individual is baiting this forum and it's users so as to make the issue fresh.
Make no reference or statements please to the content of the previous post.
WE ARE SMARTER THAN THAT.
Cheers Grant.
Nice try.
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
TAKE NO POSITION.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
TAKE NO POSITION.
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
TAKE NO POSITION.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
TAKE NO POSITION.
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Thanks.
Ed
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
TAKE NO POSITION.
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
TAKE NO POSITION.
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
Thanks.
Ed
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Mine is:
This post should be removed based on Term of Service, Sec. 4. Code of Conduct whereby there is no proof that Grant O'Kane had any actual involvement in these actions and is a victim himself. The information in this post is: "4.2.1 Abuse, harassment, threats, flaming or intimidation of any person or organization" and "4.2.4 Providing information that is false, misleading or inaccurate."
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
Thanks.
Ed
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
By the way that is an issue that you need to take up with Get Satisfaction please.
Thanks
Ed
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Mr. Ed,
Why am I not permitted to speak my opinion in regards to the post of concern as others have? Is this not a free reign cite where anything can be spoken without proof or validation (as proven by the very nature of this post?)
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
By your definition you have violated Term of Service, Sec. 4. Code of Conduct
Pleas use the contact us only method and stop posting here please.
Thanks.
Ed
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
If so, then we should both be banned from "Get Satisfaction" and all of this should be removed, based on Sec. 4. As you are further proving that their accusation of my involvement states that I am not believable and "Stealing" without any proof of direct involvement.
Thanks for "discussing this further and chiming in", Mr. Ed and therefore confirming that all of our statements should be removed.
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
Silly thing is I believe you, but this discussion has no place here.
Your proof will need to be sent here....https://help.imdb.com/contact
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
And, once again, why is not ok to defend myself on the very post that is defaming me on the site that is hosting the statement?
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Why didn't yourself or anybody come to my defense and contact Mr. Vincent-P at that time and ask him for the proof of my involvement? It's one thing to say the information is false but another to point a finger and accuse a specific name without proof. I would think the site the would want to protect the integrity.
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
Posting it here is not an option. Proving this here is not an option. Use the contact method please.
Right now it's a he said, he said situation. Here it will remain until you debunk the claim.
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
This posting: https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/person-stealing-short-films-claiming-them-as-their-own-creating-fake-imdb-pages?utm_source=notification&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=new_reply&utm_content=topic_link is completely without merit in regards to the accusation of Grant O'Kane being involved in the stated actions.
It is true there was false information posted on various sites but this was done by a very jealous and malicious individual in the attempt to defame and discredit the name of Grant O'Kane and was obviously with intent to harm and damage the name of Grant O'kane both personally and professionally.
There is no proof or evidence I, Grant O'Kane himself posted any of the information in question and I believe that the post stating these accusations are false themselves and violate the Terms of Get Satisfaction under the Terms of Service sec. 4: Code of Conduct as it is "harassment and flaming as well as false, misleading or inaccurate."
I have and will continue to conduct Get Satisfaction until this post is removed. Unfortunately, at this time, their "Conduct Us" link is broken and not usable as does not allow for any registrations to occur.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Again your claim
I was maliciously digitally assaulted by a fellow film student who in turn
..
Name the name, or you have no claim.
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
If you must know, all there is is a verbal submission and I have more integrity than to name a name without tangible proof. I have taken the name to the University and Law enforcement but they are unable to do anything without electronic proof and hacking is far beyond their means or ability to investigate.
The original post should name their sources that they have to prove that they know it was actually Grant O'Kane who did the action of question, as well. If neither can provide evidence, then this discussion is over and all should be erased.
Administrator, please remove post of question.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
I have taken the name to the University and Law enforcementEvery time law enforcement is contacted a contact issues number at a bare minimum is generated for protection against suits for failure to follow through on reports made. If an actual report is made then a Case Number is issued.
Don't name the name. Name the agency and the case number or incident number.
Well?
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
All I know, is the statements in the original post are without proof of my involvement, only that the information on the sites is incorrect and that this is affecting me, Grant O'kane personally. Even my marriage and personal relations has been impacted by this.
And if I must, I will make ongoing articles and media posts on different resources to the effect that IMDb Community and Get Satisfaction allows anything to be stated without evidence regardless of the Terms. Anything to get it out there that this is false and without merit and my name should be slandered for this. As long as the original post shows up on searches for my name, then so shall all my rebutles. My name is much more important then the little time it will take to point out the two sites that allow one's name to be tarnished without proof.
And funny how all part of this discussion (which you keep asking to "DO NOT DISCUSS THIS POST AND IT'S CONTENTS. TAKE NO POSITION.", once again believe the original statements, without proof, and prefer a name to be demeaned, degraded and defamed. Seems like you have QUITE THE POSITION.
I hope someday you will feel the pain and inconvenience this has caused.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
So
Date you made contact so I can verify your claim.
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
False information, Administrator, please remove based on Terms of Service:
4. CODE OF CONDUCT
4.1 Get Satisfaction has the right, but not the obligation, to remove or block Content from the Get Satisfaction Service that it determines in its sole discretion to be in violation of these Terms of Service, to be unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable, that violates any party's intellectual property or that is detrimental to the quality or intended spirit of the Get Satisfaction Service. Get Satisfaction also has the right, but not the obligation, to limit or revoke the use privileges of the account of anyone who posts such Content or engages in such behavior.
4.2 Get Satisfaction will use common sense and business sense regarding Content or behavior allowed on or through the Get Satisfaction Service. Examples of unacceptable Content or behavior include:
4.2.1 Abuse, harassment, threats, flaming or intimidation of any person or organization.
4.2.2 Engaging in or contributing to any illegal activity or activity that violates others' rights.
4.2.3 Use of derogatory, discriminatory or excessively graphic language.
4.2.4 Providing information that is false, misleading or inaccurate.- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
It is sad that people ask one to have to prove their innocence.
I'm not asking you to believe me. I'm asking you to require proof before conviction, of having actually done it.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
He is the one you need to address.
You need to file a case
You need to seek an injunction.
You need a subpoena.
You need a trial.
You need to win.
You need to contact an attorney.
You wont get what,
You need here without these steps.
This forum is open.
Anyone can make a statement.
If that statement is causing harm, you must prove that.
The person causing harm is not this forum.
Please use the perfectly functioning contact us method.
Stop making statements that the contact us is broken. It is not.

- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Stop making statements that you have no idea about.
And all is good, I will just keep posting in open forums and social media and articles (all with major back-links) that "IMDb Community" and "Get Satisfaction" supports fake news without proof and their terms of Service mean nothing.


- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Administrator,
False information and accusation on this post, please remove based on Terms of Service:
4. CODE OF CONDUCT
4.1 Get Satisfaction has the right, but not the obligation, to remove or block Content from the Get Satisfaction Service that it determines in its sole discretion to be in violation of these Terms of Service, to be unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable, that violates any party's intellectual property or that is detrimental to the quality or intended spirit of the Get Satisfaction Service. Get Satisfaction also has the right, but not the obligation, to limit or revoke the use privileges of the account of anyone who posts such Content or engages in such behavior.
4.2 Get Satisfaction will use common sense and business sense regarding Content or behavior allowed on or through the Get Satisfaction Service. Examples of unacceptable Content or behavior include:
4.2.1 Abuse, harassment, threats, flaming or intimidation of any person or organization.
4.2.2 Engaging in or contributing to any illegal activity or activity that violates others' rights.
4.2.3 Use of derogatory, discriminatory or excessively graphic language.
4.2.4 Providing information that is false, misleading or inaccurate.- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes


Administrator,
False information and accusation on this post, please remove based on Terms of Service:
4. CODE OF CONDUCT
4.1 Get Satisfaction has the right, but not the obligation, to remove or block Content from the Get Satisfaction Service that it determines in its sole discretion to be in violation of these Terms of Service, to be unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable, that violates any party's intellectual property or that is detrimental to the quality or intended spirit of the Get Satisfaction Service. Get Satisfaction also has the right, but not the obligation, to limit or revoke the use privileges of the account of anyone who posts such Content or engages in such behavior.
4.2 Get Satisfaction will use common sense and business sense regarding Content or behavior allowed on or through the Get Satisfaction Service. Examples of unacceptable Content or behavior include:
4.2.1 Abuse, harassment, threats, flaming or intimidation of any person or organization.
4.2.2 Engaging in or contributing to any illegal activity or activity that violates others' rights.
4.2.3 Use of derogatory, discriminatory or excessively graphic language.
4.2.4 Providing information that is false, misleading or inaccurate.- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Please be cautious in what you do here.
I don't want to see anything stopping you from getting what you deserve.
Thanks.
Ed
- 7290 Posts
- 9536 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 7290 Posts
- 9536 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Sprinklr Support sprinklr.zendesk@prod0.sprinklrsupport.com
That is how you Contact Get Satisfaction!
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Thanks
Ed
- 2901 Posts
- 4892 Reply Likes
Even my "No comment." following his accusation has disappeared.
I simply wish that IMDb staff were were more and explicitely and more rapidly proactive in that kind of neverending threads...
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
And yes I saw that was missing.
- 2901 Posts
- 4892 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Subsection 4.3
Get Satisfaction cannot and need not control all Content posted by third parties on or through the Get Satisfaction Service, and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such Content. You understand that by using the Get Satisfaction Service you may be exposed to Content that you may find offensive, indecent, incorrect or objectionable and you agree that under no circumstances will Get Satisfaction be liable in any way for any Content, including any errors or omissions in any Content, or any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of your use of any Content. You understand that you must evaluate and bear all risks associated with the use of any Content, including any reliance on the content, integrity, and accuracy of such Content. If you would like to report objectionable materials, you may use the flagging feature by clicking the "Inappropriate" link attached to every topic post and reply. Urgent issues can be reported to support@getsatisfaction.com.
Odd that he failed to read and comprehend this before posting a thing.
But not odd that he more than likely did read it and decided that his "real news" omitted this and claimed that this site was "Fake News"
I guess "News" is in the eye of the beholder.
Reminds me of a line in one of the Star Trek movies. when Spock said, "a lie"? The reply was, "An Omission"!
Omissions are the lack of the full truth in any Reality.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Regardless of the outcome, as long as my side of the story is told and appears whenever this page does, no problem.
That's all a person ever what's, is for their side to be heard.
And keep in mind, I am not the one who keeps these comments going, Mr. Ed. Mr. "DO NOT DISCUSS THIS POST AND IT'S CONTENTS - TAKE NO POSITION." You clearly have a position.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
3.4.8 You hereby irrevocably release and forever discharge Get Satisfaction and its Clients and their affiliates and subsidiaries (together, the "Released Parties") from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims, damages, liabilities and demands, whether absolute or contingent and of any nature whatsoever, which you now have or hereafter can, shall or may have against the Released Parties or their respecting successors and assigns with respect to the Content, including without limitation in respect of how the Released Parties, directly or indirectly, use the Content
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Where is your statement of incorrect behavior for those two?
i have a thick skin. I can ignore those two.
What you have just done is support trolling.
Nice.
Do you support them or not?
Do you support that kind of abusive talk?
- 7290 Posts
- 9536 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes

- 7290 Posts
- 9536 Reply Likes
- 17987 Posts
- 20462 Reply Likes
You site Code of conduct rules that don't apply.
When asked to provide proof to back up your claims. You refuse.
Every time you are asked for this proof you Spam the site with the same request stated in the description.
You are not cooperating whatsoever.
Currently there is no good reason for anyone to grant your request.
I have volunteered to help you clear yourself, but you refuse to provide one shred of anything to go on.
Conclusion is.......... Occam's Razor applies.
I will not reply further as it is a waste of time to help someone that will not cooperate with clearing their good name.
Why you won't do this only makes sense when Occam's is applied.
Cheers
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
And thanks for the English lesson.
The post should be removed as there is no evidence of my personal involvement of accused action causing information that is false, misleading and inaccurate.
And yes, we'd appreciate it if you refrain from responding, as you keep mentioning, as it would appear you have no power or position to make any difference in this matter, as simply a customer and not an employee or representative.
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
Grant, you site G.S. Code of conduct only when it suits you?
Where is your statement of incorrect behavior for those two?
What you have just done is support trolling.
Nice.
Do you support them or not?
Do you support that kind of abusive talk?
- 67 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 17986 Posts
- 20427 Reply Likes
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.
Related Categories
-
Data Issues & Policy Discussions
- 27347 Conversations
- 4117 Followers