Catering has been replace by caterer in accordance to IMDB rules

  • 3
  • Problem
  • Updated 7 months ago
  • In Progress
There are 902 entries for catering but you have a rule.
Mostly, I've seen that all rules need to be deleted in favour of on-screen accuracy

https://contribute.imdb.com/updates/field/miscellaneous/job

Photo of marhleet

marhleet

  • 99 Posts
  • 79 Reply Likes

Posted 7 months ago

  • 3
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
The pulldown list includes the most common job titles. For other job titles, please choose "other" and either type it in or choose it from the browser (the icon). Please note that the job titles should reflect the person, not the task. In other words, use "script editor" instead of "script editing"; "weapons consultant" instead of "weapons consulting"; "translator" instead of "translation";


"caterer" instead of "catering".


Are you referring to this rule?
If not, are you posing an Idea to change a rule.
You are not being very clear

Could you please clarify Marhleet
Thanks
Cheers
Photo of marhleet

marhleet

  • 99 Posts
  • 79 Reply Likes
That would be the rule ... that ...

Did you even read the title ?
Lord, there is more of them

If I ask help desk I get dumb help desk staff who don’t even understand help questions
This gets me Michelle or that other bloke and actual action
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
I read the rules. "caterer" should be used by rule.
The descriptions second line MAKES Zero sense.

Mostly, I've seen that all rules need to be deleted in favour of on-screen accuracy

What Rule need deleted?
Or do you really mean ALL OTHER CHOICES need to be deleted?
Thanks
And please actually answer instead of complaining.
Thanks again
Photo of Vincent Fournols

Vincent Fournols

  • 2901 Posts
  • 4885 Reply Likes
Marhleet,

Express yourself clearly and in proper English, and you will notice that everything will become smooth and swift...
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
Yes it will
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 7225 Posts
  • 9402 Reply Likes
I figure, Owen Rees is the only person ready, willing and able to answer the kinds of problems to which marhleet inarticulately draws attention (and I mean no offense by using that particular adverb since it is basically true and also an explanation for the alleged "uselessness" of the Help Desk correspondents), but I will hold out hope that Peter or gromit82 may have some input too, at some point, this week.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
Do you have a previous screenshot that shows that the number INCREASED to 902?
Or has it stayed the same for quite some time.
Or are you asking that it be allowed to be used for accuracy?
What are you trying to accomplish with this post?
You have not made it clear.
Thanks
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
There are these that have been done according to rule.
902 mistakes. You have NO Idea if those 902 were rejected. Or if they were corrected. Or removed.
There was 902 incorrectly submitted Caterings.
So what.
There are these correct ones. 25,562 according to the rule.



(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
This would not pass the editors. But it would put it on the list of options as 1, caterer idiot savant

Photo of marhleet

marhleet

  • 99 Posts
  • 79 Reply Likes
It would certainly help you, and Vincent, to get another reprimand for being nice.

If you don’t seem to understand the problem ...
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
There is no problem here.
Just an imaginary one.
Perceived only by you.
Cheers
(Edited)
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 6443 Posts
  • 7774 Reply Likes
My guess is that the entries listed as "catering" in the field browser are actually mostly modified entries such as "catering: Cate's Catering" or "catering: Los Angeles".
Photo of Eboy

Eboy

  • 1565 Posts
  • 1973 Reply Likes
Another rather confusing thread with many useless posts.

Do I understand this correctly: Marhleet, with ”a rule”, do you mean this part from the IMDb guide ( https://help.imdb.com/article/contrib...# ):

**
”Please note that the job titles should reflect the person, not the task. In other words, use "script editor" instead of "script editing"; "weapons consultant" instead of "weapons consulting"; "translator" instead of "translation"; "caterer" instead of "catering".
**

Now, while this may be true, there are probably many variations included in IMDb of various job titles. I believe IMDb staff should comment that will the ”job titles reflecting the person” rule overwrite the ”on-screen accuracy” every time?
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
Mostly, I've seen that all rules need to be deleted in favour of on-screen accuracy

This should be worded as follows:


I was wondering if the IMDb might revisit the rules and drop them in favor of true accuracy. That way the on screen credit matches whats in the database.

Marhleet, Kind Sir,
This is an Idea and not a problem categorization issue.
Thanks
Cheers.

P.S.
Tell me this extrapolation is wrong.
I doubt that you can.
It took me sleeping on it before i realized what you were getting at.
Help would be easier to achieve if you helped all be being more articulate in the future.

Now lets see what IMDb says about changing their misc crew guidelines above.
(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
Your understanding of how to edit data is not in question.
You do good work.
Very good work.
But.............
Your skills in conveying your thoughts in English are, shall we say, "lacking clarity".
We help you because we want The IMDb people to understand "What you mean"
That's all.
When we see that you are not conveying what is necessary to solve your issues, we try to translate what you say into what you mean.
That's all.
We are not trying to be difficult.
We are not singling you out.
We want you to get an answer to your queries.
That's all.
Cheers
Photo of marhleet

marhleet

  • 99 Posts
  • 79 Reply Likes
If you would just leave it alone and let Michelle do her thing, you won’t look so ....

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topi...
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
Marheleet
You won't look so..............Smart?
That get satisfaction topic points out my very point here.
Your lack of communication skills.

LOOK at your response.

Adrian got accomplished what you could not for years.
This was because he explained it correctly and provided the visuals.
Something you don't do well.


(Edited)
Photo of marhleet

marhleet

  • 99 Posts
  • 79 Reply Likes
Points out my point, exactly.
I knew exactly what he was talking about because I do edits and I knew what he was looking at without him explaining it.

You, not so much
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
???????????????????
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
Marhleet please don't reply to this. You have a valid point, that needs to be addressed. So let me restate this at the bottom so an IMDb employee can make a decision.

Could the IMdb please remove all the rules restrictions stated in this help topic so that it more accurately reflects what is on the screens of all titles. That way the database is accurate with respect to billing name choices chosen by the producers of the said titles?


From the help topic:
The pulldown list includes the most common job titles. For other job titles, please choose "other" and either type it in or choose it from the browser (the icon). Please note that the job titles should reflect the person, not the task. In other words, use "script editor" instead of "script editing"; "weapons consultant" instead of "weapons consulting"; "translator" instead of "translation": "caterer" instead of "catering".

If the change is not made it would contradict this.


The IMDb aims to be the most comprehensive and reliable source of information on movies, TV and celebrities. We are committed to accuracy.
(Edited)
Photo of Michelle

Michelle, Official Rep

  • 12687 Posts
  • 9573 Reply Likes
Hi All -

Thanks for calling out the Occupations contradiction on this Help guide, I have filed a ticket for our editorial team to address the text changes/policy, the team will review and update the guide accordingly.
(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 15381 Posts
  • 17569 Reply Likes
Thank you Michelle