advanced title search improvement

  • 2
  • Problem
  • Updated 2 years ago
  • Solved
Advanced Title Search is so wonderful but it could be even better.

1) I'm having difficulty with Number of Votes. For example, I type 3,000 to 200,000, but titles with only 5 or 105 votes still come up with the list. Can't we just request > greater than a certain number?

2) I wish I could search for TV series and mini series that are not TV-MA, as in, show me every TV series rated from 8 to 10 that is NOT TV-MA.

3) I wish I could search for all feature films that are based on true life/fact based.

4) I wish I could search for feature film that are NOT rated R. Someone may suggest that I check G, PG and PG-13, but there are some old classics that are not rated and they will be excluded from the search.

I suspect it would be easy for the database administrator to add these functionalities to the query page. I just don't have time or patience to sift through a list, the contents of which are 60% of what I'm trying to avoid.
Photo of Minnie Mouse

Minnie Mouse

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 2 years ago

  • 2
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 8321 Posts
  • 10913 Reply Likes
Regarding #1, if you only fill out the first box for the number of votes you should get all matches with more than that number of votes. However, it looks like you can't use commas.

#3, there are some keywords for that, such as based-on-true-story ( There are also genres like History, Biography and War, which should always be about real events.

#4, you're in luck because they are working on an update to allow this.
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 7480 Posts
  • 9924 Reply Likes
It drops off everything after the first comma instead of removing the commas? Interesting.
Photo of Steve

Steve, Official Rep

  • 1807 Posts
  • 1425 Reply Likes
Hi Minnie,

I have forwarded all of these suggestions to our team in charge of updates to advanced title search for their review. I am changing this topic to an "Idea" thread so other users can provide their input.

Peter did provide some good suggestions to address your current issues above. Regarding your first question, you can resolve the issue without any updates from our Search team by omitting punctuation from the Number of Votes field (e.g. 3000 to 200000, not 3,000 to 200,000):,200000&sort=num_votes,desc

 This is by design, as there is not a single accepted punctuation mark to separate digit groupings (commas, periods, or spaces, depending on location).

Thanks for taking the time to reach out!

- Steve
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27783 Reply Likes
US Certificates
Needs an unrated box added
For greater than.... just leave the max votes box blank. And yes leave out those commas
Photo of Steve

Steve, Official Rep

  • 1807 Posts
  • 1425 Reply Likes
Official Response
Following up here - the suggestion to allow punctuation when inputting number of votes has been implemented. No need to omit this punctuation going forward!


Photo of Vincent Fournols

Vincent Fournols

  • 2901 Posts
  • 4907 Reply Likes
Thanks Steve.

By punctuation, you mean comma, period or spaces according to the "workstation" (including mobile devices) setup?