A Sincere Appeal to User List Creators

  • 1
  • Idea
  • Updated 5 months ago
  • (Edited)
Dear IMDb and Fellow Listees: 

I would like appeal to fellow listees to support the implementation of upgrades to the user-list feature on IMDb.

Though responsible for millions of views a month, it is no secret a number of changes to user-lists over the years has been detrimental to the overall user-list experience. My fear is user-lists may become redundant unless action is taken to enhance this feature.

Here is a previous thread that relates to this issue: getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/the-related-user-lists-for-a-specific-movie-has-become-useless-to-find-similar-movies-to-watch

If you think this is relevant to yourself, please show your support.
Thanks. 
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
  • Hopeful

Posted 5 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
And what if one thinks differently than you?
I happen to agree and disagree with you.
User lists are what they are.
Rules need not exist to suit some small minority on lists.
I have actually gleaned some useful information from "Those Large" lists you show such disdain for.
Annoying to me is small related lists.
Or as you say lists that are totally unrelated and run of in a million different directions. Those are not wanted. I Agree.
But what is your solution?

You have a complaint. Yes.
To quote you.....
"I would like appeal to fellow listees [sic] to support the implementation of upgrades to the user-list feature on IMDb."

While it may be nice to have an idea, it is also good to present an implementable plan.
Unfortunately, you have none that we can as you say, "please show your support" for!

Who's gonna write the software?
Who's gonna decide what's relevant or not?
Who's gonna field the complaints when someone is unhappy that a list is left out, or when someone is unhappy that a list "IS" not left out, or when they are certain that some arbitrary rule was unfairly applied to their hard work?

Conclusion:

You have an idea alright.
You will undoubtedly get a few to agree with your assessment.
But you will never get this implemented because of the animosity it would create.
Nice Idea = Extrapolated bad results overall!
(Edited)
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
Hi Ed Jones

Support includes the implementation of ideas. Support means if people acknowledge there is a problem they are willing to express this and support change.

You, yourself, acknowledge there is a problem. Instead of being critical why not try and be constructive? I am sure you can put forward some helpful ideas if you try.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
I extrapolated what your idea would bring forth.
Unnecessary conflict.
It's that simple.

Re-quoting myself in case you glossed over why it wont work.

Who's gonna decide what's relevant or not?
Who's gonna field the complaints when someone is unhappy that a list is left out, or when someone is unhappy that a list "IS" not left out, or when they are certain that some arbitrary rule was unfairly applied to their hard work?


Also, to Quote you...
Why not put forward ideas that are constructive?
Why should my replies only be constructive.
Are realistic observations out of bounds?
Are you suggesting I be silent if I have an opinion?
Or even worse, should I be silent if it does not agree with you?
And quite frankly my suggestions were constructive.
Why you ask?
Because they pointed out the conflicts that will arise if "your" idea were to ever be implemented.
Avoiding conflict is a constructive idea....Thank you very much!

And I'm done commenting.
On both threads.
Thanks.
But your making me restate the obvious.
I will not allow this to escalate.
We need to agree to disagree.
Cheers
:):)
(Edited)
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
That's great Ed Jones. My sentiments exactly. Glad we could find some common ground.
Cheers - and have a nice day.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes, Champion

  • 2397 Posts
  • 4018 Reply Likes
The thread you highlight is a collection of many related threads about Related User Lists. Unfortunately, the root post does not propose a specific suggestion, so voting "for" the Idea has no meaning to me. 

I suspect that, to find a useful list, the user has to scan the titles of the lists offered and see what appeals to them. Having a voting system just invites trolls who downvote based on prejudices. Having a popularity system just perpetuates the lists that reach popular-critical-mass the soonest, and blocks future great lists.

So we would need multiple ways to sort the Related User Lists (Useful, Popular, Recent, other?), like Reviews.

And IMDb doesn't actually show us all the user lists. They reserve the right to omit some, and limit the display to 1000.

We used to have a Like button on lists, but I think it was a Facebook thing, and you had to go to Facebook to see which lists you had Liked, but I never found such a feature. And Like been gone for quite a while. 

I agree that I use Related Lists less now than in the past. But I don't even want to read through all 24 ideas in that thread to Like individual posts. 

But if someone comes up with a great idea, I'd support it.

Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
My sentiments exactly.
There is but an "idea" presented here.
It has no structure or viable implementation plan.
It does however present challenges that have yet to be addressed as you mention above.
One of those is the glaring "troll" issue.
That would create the disharmony I mentioned.
I too would support a "Great Idea" if one was presented.
This so far falls far short of being "Great"
Thanks
:):)
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
You have misunderstood the real purpose of this thread. Please refer to my reply to bderoes, for clarity.

Thanks
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
Hi bderoes

The purpose of this thread was not created to accumulate likes, but to appeal to people, such as yourself, who have both know-how and are willing to put forward suggestions to improve the user-list experience. I apologize if I did not make that clear in my initial comment.

As you have discussed in your post, I think a feature similar to that found on "User Reviews" is a great option. Do you have any further views on this? And do you think it possible IMDb may consider implementing such a feature on "User-Lists"?

Your response will be much appreciated.
Thanks


Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
HI Ed

You are very consistent in pointing out issues, yet, until now, you have not offered any solutions. One can therefor conclude, either you do not want to see changes implemented or, you simply cannot come up with any solutions.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
You are very consistent in pointing out issues, yet, until now, you have not offered any solutions. One can therefor conclude, either you do not want to see changes implemented
You got that right. No changes. Not my Idea. It's your incomplete idea.


By the way....................
The "Solution" is obvious!
As Nancy Reagan, our first Lady once said, "Just Say No"
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
We don't need a voting system. We already have one.
List views.






Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
Here's an Idea I'd vote for.

List users... Please voluntarily make private your low activity/views............Lists.

Or a system that automatically determines after a fixed time period a way to sort lists by views. Say 1 year. Also if your views are below a set number after that year, it automatically becomes a private list.
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
In response to your previous post, above:

If you bothered to read my earlier post - as pointed out earlier - the purpose of this thread is to appeal to creative people who can put forward creative ideas to improve the user-list experience.

As I have pointed out, you either do not want to see changes implemented (for reasons of your own), or you simply do not have the ability to come up with any solutions. And if you do not have any solutions, why are you consistently trolling this thread?

Unless I am vastly mistaken, Getsatisfaction is a site where one should be able to get help. And if that is true, you are violating the very fundamentals of what this site thrives to do. You sir do not dictate what policy IMDb decides upon, or the changes they decide to implement on their site. That is a decision entirely in the hands of IMDb staff and owners.

Here is a quote by the late great Muhammad Ali that I think is very applicable to this situation:

"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it.
Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion.
Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare.
Impossible is potential.
Impossible is temporary.
Impossible is nothing." - Muhammad Ali.

P.S: I am editing this post to point out in the process of creating the above, Ed suddenly puts forward an idea. Simply as a means to counteract this response. I see right through you Ed. I hope others do too.
(Edited)
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
Hi Ed 

Alright, let's see what your idea entails: "Please voluntarily make private your low activity/views" - I doubt very much users will go for that. 

I must admit your second suggestion sounds more feasible. However, list-sorting based on views had been in use until it proved unproductive and IMDb resorted to the new algorithm based system. Maybe one can incorporate number of views and an up/down voting system to establish ranking and do away with a present list function that may cause conflict in this area? 

Anyway, regardless of your intentions, thanks for posting your idea.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
Maybe one can incorporate number of views and an up/down voting system to establish ranking and do away with a present list function that may cause conflict in this area?

Look, you and I have been keeping this thread alive. Other than you, NO ONE is supporting this idea.
This is not trolling. It's only trolling by your definition. Every time you have a reply I debate your reply. That is not trolling nor is it a violation of get satisfactions TOU. I have thoroughly read sections 1 and 4 of that TOU. Also calling me out for trolling is labeling me a troll. That IS in violation of section 4. Please refrain from labeling persons trolls Thank You.

No Up/Down Voting
End Transmission.
Your just sore that this has no support.
I need not reply further nor debate you any longer on this lost cause of an idea.
Please refrain from repeating yourself.
I will if you will.
Thanks
Cheers
:):)
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
First off: If there is a post on this subject I am going to answer it. That is not a violation of Get Satisfaction policy but what this site was created for. If you don't wish to post on this thread - Don't. Simple as that.

Secondly: Do you think I used the term trolling on a whim? I first consulted the Get Satisfaction Community Guidelines, read the definition of internet troll on Wikipedia, and consulted an acquaintance who is well-versed on the subject. In view of this I stick by my convictions. Regardless of any consequences thereof. You know what they say; It is far better to die standing than living a life on your knees.

And lastly, you know very well it is you yourself that is sore. The manner of your response proves it.

Anyway, thanks for all your constructive input.
It was a real pleasure talking to you.


Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
As I predicted, you have once again returned to this thread, to an issue you have made very clear you have no interest in. Or wish to contribute to.

You have now made it abundantly clear that this is a clear case of harassment and trolling. This, as you are well aware of, is not the first time you have exhibited this type of behavior. You already have a number of complaints to your credit. In other words, a history of behavioral issues.

In view of the above, I respectfully ask you to cease and desist.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
I think I just said that already.

This is no longer worth following.
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
Yes, ad nauseam. For a second time: I respectfully ask you to cease and desist.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23311 Posts
  • 27775 Reply Likes
I have. As requested. As stated. For the 3rd time.
Photo of Dr-Faustus

Dr-Faustus

  • 219 Posts
  • 172 Reply Likes
I hope you are aware you are in violation of Get Satisfaction policy. So, for the third time: I respectfully ask you to cease and desist.
Photo of bderoes

bderoes, Champion

  • 2397 Posts
  • 4018 Reply Likes
I'll post this here first to see if any useful comments are made.

Draft Idea: Metalists

I would like a way to bookmark/like/categorize lists I find useful.
I realize I can do that with folders in my browser, but how would people viewing IMDb on an App do that?

So I propose a new list type: Metalist.
  1. A Metalist would have a title and a description as current lists do. But the entries on a Metalist would be the location of title/name/image lists on IMDb.
  2. Each public list on IMDb would need a dropdown + button so I can select the Metalist on which I want to save it.
  3. Perhaps we need 3 types of Metalist, one for each type of list.
  4. It would be nice to allow Advanced Search to access a Metalist, and search for titles/names included/excluded on any of the lists appearing there.
  5. For the Related User Lists feature on title/name pages, lists appearing on Metalist(s) could be prioritized toward the front of the Related feature (based on the assumption that the list was Metalisted for a good reason.)
--